IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 04 April 2015 02:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78281A87C3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:05:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i0WdFpsFGu0h for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x235.google.com (mail-wg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 450A31A87B2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgbdm7 with SMTP id dm7so122607365wgb.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 19:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5bJzRPCmGBS3YbehUA46HJVJhkeWRdk4bBcRDBFAjYs=; b=jCfQJTIClleA4rul+FhfCjfD9oyA9bmR+ayzBTU/IZHUWv9GM1hQd74rh1pCqe+ZKh okaQ93szFc0OwjZriftZT6YLqRqpKrnY0bCC5G2tVYvdecN/4VBWzJWq0NwzbEhj9VBv 78d+htTo2Y8lFO61qVBoCg2p3Vmtc55/2MC5Gmm9rcpSc1cAWLOIHdH03r1NJJDgcci0 oUEZ5EQoSSagd5/u1hlv/EPb2kAr2tQanTuC6Ps6momV7OolgoA/O+olSoq8mM2BKdmm kC1OgnVxplQHm6FIUwc9cux+2b2fwq2gTr7bAy5SATMsyK1zLA0UIAp9UG+EDN8olqyY TF4w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.84.198 with SMTP id b6mr38719425wiz.25.1428113105088; Fri, 03 Apr 2015 19:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.5.97 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnX+Z3SuMC+OLXapRKwNZJjDxC+4rbcWk9gahP0M3YkSUw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOgPGoCW-znnh5VFobCFjZafxEOcwsaHZ_eByTwpCpmqfgX=6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnX+Z3SuMC+OLXapRKwNZJjDxC+4rbcWk9gahP0M3YkSUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 22:05:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CADZyTkkSTA1m7Xx9wKbp=T-eoK9mk+Bogkh-tyk2Q7WW8bm0rA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0418264a53f4fe0512dc7ecf"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Q1x6WQFv_JLxfk8QsF3oYx42C98>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Consensus call on Implicit IV for AEAD
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 02:05:08 -0000

Fine to me. BTW how do you position this toward FIPS/NIST Cryptographic
Module Validation program?


On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> WFM
>
> On 3 April 2015 at 13:34, Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> wrote:
> > In the interim meeting we had consensus to use an implicit IV for AEAD.
> The
> > proposal was to use the record sequence number and pad with zeros as
> > described in pull request 155
> > (https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/155/files).  This was also
> > discussed in the IETF-92 meeting in Dallas along with options to change
> the
> > offset.  The consensus was to stay with the original proposal.  We are
> > posting to the mailing list to confirm this consensus. If you have
> comments,
> > please reply by April 17, 2015.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > S&J
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list
> > TLS@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>



-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email