Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3?
Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 19 October 2014 13:03 UTC
Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886981A0179 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 06:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lyo3WNnTiTQM for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 06:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B15B1A0166 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 06:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u10so2648894lbd.15 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 06:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=zjrTrfmZYrhXaWYvXFNd/vrNQRjqyFIfNkj7+Fe1+uY=; b=aQ/pvHQbucj9EFL91+QtAc//eIpj5hnY/lSbMAeLOnx4gvfP1Y018trbSMM6zIvH0T cCR2xOZghVK5aI4EWJULb3pfNFJlXdsIvAACoEn4pjvcRMqot/fiRFu/YR6RpdCb5UVs H7nhds+9QOAs4IrhY7gFyxNDYkeIXtV2gLTdifzsu2ccFrfXwZ/8woMSui/PHB4Wc2zV xtTDJs8yKM8wW+3CZm7+87lwjpH/0TAP16zL4H15boFObpqF3ZzC58slmDrOalOAI9sh 2Nbz/Oz4vjBiDm6E54QbM1wxxepMf+sNc9MNilySoDVbqEi88l2vNvxfQpTxD3nt+U+0 KQNQ==
X-Received: by 10.152.27.38 with SMTP id q6mr2352796lag.92.1413723824673; Sun, 19 Oct 2014 06:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.24.248.215] (dyn32-131.checkpoint.com. [194.29.32.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id lv10sm2203959lac.7.2014.10.19.06.03.43 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 19 Oct 2014 06:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <544384C7.9030002@polarssl.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 16:03:40 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <78795A6D-3DFA-41C6-A380-C63DDF4C0285@gmail.com>
References: <544384C7.9030002@polarssl.org>
To: Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard <mpg@polarssl.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/QZShL2dormD055Ht8PJDV43JdLE
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 13:03:47 -0000
As Ilari said, there are ciphersuites with PSK and FS. I don’t see what the rationale can be to allow non-PFS for PSK authentication, but prohibit it for certificate authentication. That would imply that we can make a blanket statement that the data passed in PSK-authenticated sessions is inherently low-value or non-private. I don’t think we can make that statement. Yoav
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Yoav Nir
- [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Hauke Mehrtens
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Hauke Mehrtens
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Jeffrey Walton
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Paul Bakker
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Mohamad Badra
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Peter Gutmann
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Yoav Nir
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Sven Schäge
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Christian Kahlo
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? John Mattsson
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Alex Elsayed
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Stephen Checkoway
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Stephen Checkoway
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Dan Harkins
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Stephen Checkoway
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] PSK in 1.3? Watson Ladd