Re: [TLS] Before we PQC... Re: PQC key exchange sizes

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sun, 07 August 2022 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85DAC15A73C for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 14:11:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j7V6VR3cW-1v for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 14:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62f.google.com (mail-ej1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BC52C14F607 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 14:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id gk3so13275779ejb.8 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 14:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gYlpA9dHKDkR0dTz+UDimVf2aE+3YEKa2lTZgCWUPyk=; b=aWvRIrQa2E08UwrbAfxCk/BBOo8ZpmmxeTpZFeu+txiPf23pOCOB4oZ7Bbjq6H0xbV GBSNUnWB3k1qJGoTHD4eu9EiPIaP0PSbKVrjtfEBeESw7mTwx4j6UeRwRA/LAagCWzwc IsZFIewmkYRprp7HWFJmdn/rtb7XAQE7A9a6NscF66d+pDDNwWj4V0uTwNtIXUkL0yJV +xXHCHKmmJ84Dz8QiDvplWlQYZ6HjOkzIz6bfOzGxJPQ35boKGA3zHrv2QnqIlWcltNO rDaSin36Em6kQ+BOqDnnp2Hl2DtCWa7B6V6STPA/pfy+1ZVMkSrMPbPhdLMKxOvTm0Gq L2og==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gYlpA9dHKDkR0dTz+UDimVf2aE+3YEKa2lTZgCWUPyk=; b=WFOHcF+3eC1DKN6Mrc+jzi8q0rd9PAsDaRCetdDsCzXwpQGNBmFZP44dLCGOBSMWhT Tkv/uLExKdzQdMLgm/TW5CEMWWG96L5ej1pCKsmylMxR/G59T+W7WlVAqf0wjy0OmwVg rXN/V/RCjUC9Wap4m1tbt50A6MbBa0x7hmxo9Xwk7s6jVS1JclJg/W+STwU9lKErQt/d uANtMNuNZUqly89SU4ELA7A+303CPlqkxmi/sKYF/wTdCSyMzSrbjAH1QqMFyJYUzmvI sFaboxFdlrIfrq+TFyPCwE/Dt1pm3ZGrU4L/awsXWCpehBK2TCgK4y/+IRRD621GmiAT Nhsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo3nYeAEO+Z6G87p3THcclRuKhzGK1o6BZDcDff2CVQbgpiFMN/a xm6/XzJr5KbZgGoM9Cz20e6AxEZrgjJlJOSyMruMDj8n
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4squANEQKroJ/89vmJBY2xkEu4XOL+3bzoCkSozVXc6U5/fVmSy80t9doUqlHyz2ljXNomxYKiJAUUyM5dpg0=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8cb0:b0:730:d6f3:279e with SMTP id qr48-20020a1709068cb000b00730d6f3279emr12263670ejc.25.1659906670108; Sun, 07 Aug 2022 14:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABzBS7nsbEhR-bmHG_ViSJFSH-0_5p0O3vKndS4+wFR=iGQzhw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+LwgAzb4t=awzpU4Sb5j7Bf6DuR3u+23n+h_C3Pnsin-SHg@mail.gmail.com> <8383756C-5595-4028-9E5E-8B758147ED33@ll.mit.edu> <CAMm+LwgHNL_aHqK+TbdBf=xJBPftjkXL_=isXUJB+mbiUc7_Lw@mail.gmail.com> <58778bee-ccd8-3b6b-cdf3-7392cd6f3187@riseup.net> <CAChr6SxXVzKptFzDEczOUzVf+LGSNxY=rk45DgXceg_anA_SPQ@mail.gmail.com> <20220806051541.GQ3579@akamai.com> <CAChr6Sy3vGbcDCDXWOGNwLQgwZZG_z3HTSgz54Ch2_vurF++RA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwj19zmbPo+53Zk8m3AOWPGF8mhyB9SPTVP7mP0DsWpPzQ@mail.gmail.com> <SY4PR01MB62514622B4DE2AF47F1B1DD2EE609@SY4PR01MB6251.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com> <CAMm+LwhdxdWJsqCW295Byu1OFDqbTnJR91MFdBHAY6tkk59Jag@mail.gmail.com> <795BED30-B499-4E64-915F-4317C629E908@ll.mit.edu> <DM4PR11MB545560CE4F54D5B9B3455BBFC1609@DM4PR11MB5455.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR11MB545560CE4F54D5B9B3455BBFC1609@DM4PR11MB5455.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2022 14:10:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sx9uOGGQJa1QdreGoN0v=b5Xycn9tQfcRLNdF0D51V1fg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)" <sfluhrer=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL" <uri@ll.mit.edu>, Phillip Hallam-Baker <ietf@hallambaker.com>, "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006ea6a905e5ad234d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Sk1lItzzdljiuXg1cscdSlcL6NQ>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Before we PQC... Re: PQC key exchange sizes
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2022 21:11:16 -0000

On Sun, Aug 7, 2022 at 1:59 PM Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer) <sfluhrer=
40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

>
> Actually, we came up with the concept while evaluating PAKEs for the CFRG,
> and in the that context, it makes sense.


The problem is that the term "Quantum Annoyance" is an equivocation.


>  you're still "mostly safe".
>

Like this phrase.

I don't really have a strong opinion on these matters, but it seems like
too much hand waving to me.

thanks,
Rob