IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Moving the ECH interop target

Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> Mon, 08 March 2021 19:11 UTC

Return-Path: <caw@heapingbits.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E633A1553 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:11:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.82
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.82 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heapingbits.net header.b=O++To/Lp; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=H2+zPp3k
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oS6quPfww_Bo for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:11:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D3163A1552 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 11:11:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C942E5C00CB for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:11:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap4 ([10.202.2.54]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:11:22 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heapingbits.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=vL/mzUz1B8zRf6AGTE1IDwifCpv++DR CnsgEkT76WuI=; b=O++To/LpRhzAKfDziHLdW6wiKvcUHz8FifwVXLcpLF7yM6/ 6mpdTbx2fmQIfXaOb3woxCCLUJGW7tdSAi/OOtjr2IFM5en7iTVB1qCFALStXG7+ ZrnNbQdzYv/2E3PubbULGS4xtRB7zgoqhIPnrtkHYdz09bWbbHDH8gUcNdJfddBl jidUpr5lD31SVuLlnwNexCQTijMlIGiTTnX2UKHqKQQS9Kbq3Vzjkl1M55ILPabx IJhfsFecnF4051eIdObtKo2ARa4mCTm5E/TAkKh+F0R4MQk5b4kX9yjcNK79m9fP Ks+gl5hBUiNhUglmiPfFDvkVNWNOXcmjtxuqS2w==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=vL/mzU z1B8zRf6AGTE1IDwifCpv++DRCnsgEkT76WuI=; b=H2+zPp3kPWiPrFv798l+Rh IzbMRRqwcyFqs4JIgy8ucfux3T/l9pkbghBwjKbT0BGu5bZ+ff4LqtA0n2k1leyb U7Q8Hrb1kJpmawlisB8W/ou49Qsy60DVRL9zsmq7aBeZWxfhBx9AIhA/IlC/AisV 0cnNEY9ONL0bX7mwmbYHLgYsrVolgocAQ7Eqo+TetAYi7iFerKTpbPMC+nI+OvsS 8rfxUs86U1m/empTksuD16uAbrlQoMpg8A7KUaUcB2m+KZbGc2ca80gpZoZSLo1F 2LME61xqzCchev8RkYOFJ0uTVVUO27yKfGWn4ZvWvsRZ2u6QJ3SEJ4rs4v3HK1XQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:2nZGYFRt87Cgyn4X0ziar7WKtoxK-bD6J8LcqDAD87ZyjWDKK-rS3g> <xme:2nZGYOwgRfULXOErUV5HFVAfGqogamfctNHUFejbAXOe2IR_BDaROV6xph9WZ65Si naG7_X-4TCIsQd3D64>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddugedgheejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgoufhushhpvggtthffohhmrghinhculdegledmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdevhhhr ihhsthhophhhvghrucghohhougdfuceotggrfieshhgvrghpihhnghgsihhtshdrnhgvth eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdfhteeuheetgfegueehteeljeejffeftdegtdeuvdej ueffleetgfegjeehkeefnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghdpghhithhhuhgsrd hiohenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegt rgifsehhvggrphhinhhgsghithhsrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:2nZGYK1k84LhRMMPndqRmL7N7Kh6MOgWDfs2dPcIB4r7df8I-z26aw> <xmx:2nZGYNC3dIhsUGOMzvn6o85XlPkCcyWv6bZxhUWFPHRkTJ_yupZfLA> <xmx:2nZGYOjn2gYQ1FS9ssURV-ru88xYn4AZ2-GJruuN6J_uOp3n14yN9Q> <xmx:2nZGYJuuvIVXSkNy0A-obbGa932yUHBTGXtznOVRoTc7r5OALBIuoA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id A15A31601B4; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 14:11:22 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-206-g078a48fda5-fm-20210226.001-g078a48fd
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <9caeb96a-8371-48f5-bf06-01a77e5327bd@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8e41260d-6422-4dd3-82cc-b7aec9744613@www.fastmail.com>
References: <8e41260d-6422-4dd3-82cc-b7aec9744613@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 11:11:02 -0800
From: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: "TLS@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/UslxkP9g2UysudkMewSznOMkwBM>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Moving the ECH interop target
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 19:11:25 -0000

As discussed during today's call, -10 is now out. I'll update pointers in the interop matrix and related pages.

Stay tuned for a doodle to schedule the interim meetings!

Best,
Chris (no hat)

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021, at 10:07 AM, Christopher Wood wrote:
> The WG previously decided to make draft-ietf-tls-esni-09 the official 
> target for interop. The diff between this version and the current 
> editor's copy of the draft is below:
> 
>    
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tls-esni.txt&url2=https://tlswg.github.io/draft-ietf-tls-esni/draft-ietf-tls-esni.txt
> 
> Given the size of the diff, and the recent update to HPKE to prepare it 
> for IRSG review, I'd like to propose that we cut -10 (when the 
> datatracker opens) and use that as the new interop target. This will 
> resolve the moving HPKE target going forward and let that part of the 
> protocol stabilize.
> 
> What do other implementers think?
> 
> Thanks,
> Chris (no hat)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email