IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Moving the ECH interop target

Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> Wed, 24 February 2021 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <caw@heapingbits.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957873A19A5 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:08:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heapingbits.net header.b=CyLwjlC/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=iPwSRVe9
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wZHKMvVFOjby for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:08:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A66F3A1945 for <TLS@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:07:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDDE5C0193 for <TLS@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 13:07:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap4 ([10.202.2.54]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 13:07:58 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heapingbits.net; h=mime-version:message-id:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s= fm3; bh=XEHY1raCFzkQjTvX6w8u5fY1OY3I1E9iTdNI/XR7X9Y=; b=CyLwjlC/ A+4cfa2scp773ZzCUvR15H1/zKPDt1cR7ujazn1+6mYz2sn0NkGgxmAYTGL8cjvF iWRYA5kq9KaAO+VIuIp61wP/uAMgzgjhHXCCxrjyOM4jA4ZjERwSKu9Wof64w2vp zp/k3iQ+sBBtkrr5NJZ0MktkP+0YcB3ta4T9q33e/X++JhWv6onNpdnmdlll4HdK rMO8QT4FdkzIUa4LDgiG/vMCyQYKecQaEzFonkoYmoSGgj99SVYXOXicCRhfjEVx YF945gI6dFWR61VZ4e1hO3dsZT4GJCPCEuPNGyt4+8kP9LySjzx60E3YWh/xXnmV ev/G4DYTFy7peg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=XEHY1raCFzkQjTvX6w8u5fY1OY3I1 E9iTdNI/XR7X9Y=; b=iPwSRVe9J0pxcTKUWhdqjJqCrMANLa3K6XXRV5nIwBIv4 7CJWA54Sw2Slyw6/bWfdOVDuGDjn0fLpG3O8ctZQD/D8Ic6KNlDgrqH3AkSFheVk ZO++QyhKzfPXc0c+AGKVDjlipYZ8XenEOX0aqSAnbOaNnaypaR5hKnE4QyNH6vPD ho5bktupc+QGi6FjD+Y5Jab9P6J3TWSEgDPar8k7lCB6MEDZu+l/p4ArJjOaxTUy FwrJIwI7IBFxIYY2VJSiK/4VfpWn5gRwS3rKjjjfGP7SMJYID6G7OVrB/Wfap6I0 EcwQ9rG9n+PUsxA7tyho3cdvnH7KwnDePFZZgRl7w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:_pU2YK8PrjfXtksP6cOCOuguoj-YV9y2e5YkQLOPC3eMC_lTG3lKRA> <xme:_pU2YKsDfpYEe4PEin-3t9RrX37J4JtljPCjBi_RwEf0DpnTUlwgTCMMmZwofHe8f rgZoilkL_zS6j3ThKU>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkeejgddutdejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucgoufhushhpvggtthffohhmrghinhculdegledmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkfffhvffutgesthdtredtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdevhhhrihhs thhophhhvghrucghohhougdfuceotggrfieshhgvrghpihhnghgsihhtshdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfefjeetjedtgffhudethffgtdetudfglefhteekueegvedu keefieduvdefkedvnecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghdpghhithhhuhgsrdhioh enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegtrgif sehhvggrphhinhhgsghithhsrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:_pU2YACK9-3X4CQ07HvQBHTBCwcrEb0jMYzBOp3yu12rQ0YQI0WAGA> <xmx:_pU2YCcuRTVO7iF5luV1Q9oGrOEi58_oAZ9gemPj84bl6feW4Gdysw> <xmx:_pU2YPN0I3DXmU5zMhllJJ9u2Hzdm5ZIx1uGe2JmaSuIQmAhJA4Gaw> <xmx:_pU2YFYhycoHiu6c5sxK7_g9MFw6jOtv_3Nk2dhmYPmgjkhesIMKBg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3D2351600A8; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 13:07:58 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-141-gf094924a34-fm-20210210.001-gf094924a
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <8e41260d-6422-4dd3-82cc-b7aec9744613@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 10:07:37 -0800
From: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: "TLS@ietf.org" <TLS@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/KluT9tockL5kDcIaevGOhyLWUDc>
Subject: [TLS] Moving the ECH interop target
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 18:08:13 -0000

The WG previously decided to make draft-ietf-tls-esni-09 the official target for interop. The diff between this version and the current editor's copy of the draft is below:

   https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-tls-esni.txt&url2=https://tlswg.github.io/draft-ietf-tls-esni/draft-ietf-tls-esni.txt

Given the size of the diff, and the recent update to HPKE to prepare it for IRSG review, I'd like to propose that we cut -10 (when the datatracker opens) and use that as the new interop target. This will resolve the moving HPKE target going forward and let that part of the protocol stabilize.

What do other implementers think?

Thanks,
Chris (no hat)

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status