Re: [TLS] ban more old crap
Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sat, 25 July 2015 13:08 UTC
Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90951B2DE9 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Hn9yb0aGP5F for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B2DF1B2E0F for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1B8BE88 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:08:28 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KsRm17pJHCqd for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:08:27 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.17.4.205] (unknown [193.86.243.7]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13813BE58 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:08:26 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1437829707; bh=RYKREjfb/wAUx11PGooaeUPnZcBVeNQbnONeWrtvS7I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=wuDnh71Rx0WJhi0R6pMu7ltGnqPNPi17aXztBNaT+Rke6Blg/LYdK7ItMF3+W1+3K ZC99kvXQo+7o/MXN+UsAwkLr3Xn5g/Yr7S+WqpSkYS/dUJioZHO/FzDswOOtlYHPl4 YcMYgPut49ZZmEDv9Kt1+u/c3yNOm3aCEjgGS8Ho=
Message-ID: <55B38A47.2010002@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 14:08:23 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tls@ietf.org
References: <201507221610.27729.davemgarrett@gmail.com> <201507241257.43115.davemgarrett@gmail.com> <2164745.i4WjRk8WKj@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <201507241403.14071.davemgarrett@gmail.com> <20150725054622.GK4347@mournblade.imrryr.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150725054622.GK4347@mournblade.imrryr.org>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/eYpQWiChMjj7XM3cx7I7gvbPpfE>
Subject: Re: [TLS] ban more old crap
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 13:08:31 -0000
(no hats and al that) On 25/07/15 06:46, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > I hope, that by ~2017, RC4 will no longer be required either, and > we'll be able to disable RC4 in Postfix at that time. Seems to me that should be a reasonable match for expecting to see TLS1.3 getting deployed in lots of parts of the mail infrastructure, so that date would argue to not support rc4 at all in TLS1.3 in my conclusion (not that I know much about mail deployment trends). And if we have any support for rc4 in TLS1.3 it'll end up a footgun that'll damage many toes, so count me amongst those arguing for no rc4 (or similar) at all in TLS1.3. Cheers, S.
- [TLS] A la carte concerns from IETF 93 Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] A la carte concerns from IETF 93 Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] A la carte concerns from IETF 93 Ilari Liusvaara
- [TLS] ban more old crap (was: A la carte concerns… Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap (was: A la carte conc… Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap (was: A la carte conc… Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap (was: A la carte conc… Yuhong Bao
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap (was: A la carte conc… Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Hubert Kario
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Yuhong Bao
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Ilari Liusvaara
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Benjamin Beurdouche
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Martin Thomson
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Viktor Dukhovni
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Dave Garrett
- Re: [TLS] ban more old crap Viktor Dukhovni