Re: [TLS] Next steps for draft-agl-tls-padding

[Andrey Jivsov <[e-mail]>]

>
> 1. Introduction
>
>
>    Successive TLS [RFC5246] versions have added support for more cipher
>    suites and, over time, more TLS extensions have been defined.  This
>    has caused the size of the TLS ClientHello to grow and the additional
>    size has caused some implementation bugs to come to light.  At least
>    one of these implementation bugs can be ameliorated by making the
>    ClientHello even larger.

( Sorry if it was already discussed )

I suggest to explain why the last sentience in the above paragraph holds 
true. The paragraph leads the reader to the idea that "larger 
ClientHello --> bugs", but then there is a shift that "even larger 
ClientHello --> fewer bugs".

The spec would benefit from a suggestion about what the recommended use 
of the padding extension is (i.e. to which size one should pad).

Thank you.