Re: [TLS] Next steps for draft-agl-tls-padding

WG Members,

Based on this discussion the chairs believe we have sufficient support to
ask for an early code point assignment. This message serves as a request
to the chair to do so.

Additionally, unless someone objects we intend to adopt it as a WG draft.
If there are any objections, please post them by Mon Feb 3.

-Ekr

On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Adam Langley <agl@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com> wrote:
>> A provisional code point would be nice, but I had to read the
>> description of the extension contents several times and cross-check
>> with other TLS extension documents to figure out (and assure myself)
>> what draft-agl-tls-padding-02 really means implementation-wise.
>
> Thanks for the comments. I think you make a good point and I've
> updated the draft
> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-agl-tls-padding-03) to include your
> suggestions. (It'll need to be updated with the precise extension
> type, if assigned.)
>
>
> Cheers
>
> AGL
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls