Re: [TLS] Prohibiting SSL 3.0

SSL 3.0 is historic, but if but if someone wants to write a draft
prohibiting SSL 3.0 the working group can consider adopting it.  We are
closing down this thread since it has diverged off topic.

J&S (as WG chairs)

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Sean Turner <TurnerS@ieca.com> wrote:

> On Oct 30, 2014, at 21:56, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > No, the root of all evil is hiring a biology student for a summer to
> > make a security protocol. It's a miracle SSLv3 works at all, showing
> > that the Lord protects drunks, fools, and interns.
>
> Watson,
>
> Please cease with the personal attacks.  As this is not the first time [0]
> you’ve been publicly ask you to stop, I have consulted with the AD and next
> time you engage in a personal attack you will be banned from the list for a
> period not to exceed 30 days [1].
>
> J&S (as WG chairs)
>
> [0] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg12146.html
> [1] http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3934/
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>