IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Request for review: Next Protocol Negotiation Extension

Marsh Ray <marsh@extendedsubset.com> Tue, 17 August 2010 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <marsh@extendedsubset.com>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F0F3A6868 for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:44:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.009
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.009 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.590, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c7mOxiCz5YJy for <tls@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4645C3A685C for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xs01.extendedsubset.com ([69.164.193.58]) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <marsh@extendedsubset.com>) id 1OlS5Y-000HjM-Ry; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:44:48 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.15] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xs01.extendedsubset.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26290608E; Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:44:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS
X-Originating-IP: 69.164.193.58
X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/mailhop/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information)
X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX19foxkkoM9ye1coIuEmpznvxFloF02tQpc=
Message-ID: <4C6AE6AD.6080402@extendedsubset.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 14:44:45 -0500
From: Marsh Ray <marsh@extendedsubset.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Thunderbird/3.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
References: <AANLkTi=5H_0hGzxMmfNU0hLS=5psW6J3c2to756OT--7@mail.gmail.com> <4C69938A.9080808@gnutls.org> <AANLkTin3eQHNJPuVuVw09FbPUF4RBk7n9RFbc7EaFbM+@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=dfCZNndm678OFkCZdzRhzfmRvBmZVLUD5-ueF@mail.gmail.com> <4C6AB936.1070801@extendedsubset.com> <AANLkTimgjqQMdwqL_xZXGSG5hSMLqDtYH62t698e_hx9@mail.gmail.com> <4C6AD7EA.4040307@extendedsubset.com> <AANLkTingQgTT9q7umj0aSE+My9J7of5a8hE2q_Mef09u@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTingQgTT9q7umj0aSE+My9J7of5a8hE2q_Mef09u@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Request for review: Next Protocol Negotiation Extension
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 19:44:19 -0000

On 08/17/2010 02:04 PM, Adam Langley wrote:
>
> I think I might be misunderstanding you.

No, I'm sure it is I who am not fully understanding. :-)

> How does session resumption
> help here?

It was just an example of an existing facility with similar goals that 
was often underutilized.

> (If you were thinking about removing a round trip with
> session resumption, we've already claimed that with False Start.
> Chrome, Android and Firefox (4) are already using False Start so TLS
> handshakes are 1 RTT with or without session resumption in our
> calculations.)

Doh!

- Marsh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email