[TLS] Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 19 January 2021 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7F03A1415; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 02:23:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate@ietf.org, tls-chairs@ietf.org, tls@ietf.org, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, sean@sn3rd.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.24.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Éric Vyncke <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <161105178017.4659.6792946319140372259@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 02:23:00 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/kkfx8wny1K5y-iGZnBg8dt9HczE>
Subject: [TLS] Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 10:23:01 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thank you for the work put into this document.

Special thanks to the shepherd, Sean Turner, who did a great job to describe
the WG consensus. Rob Wilton's point about minimum version is also important
and should be addressed in the abstract (even if the text is clearer in section

Please find below some nits.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,



-- Abstract --
"This document, if approved, formally deprecates Transport Layer" => should ",
if approved," be removed now from the abstract? The RFC Editor will probably do
it though.

-- Section 1 --
"deprecate these old versions." should the "these old version" be followed by
the enumeration ?