Re: [TLS] Éric Vyncke's Yes on draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 19 January 2021 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17FA3A1566; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 06:49:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TA_4Z8YqTpxA; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 06:49:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk1-xa2b.google.com (mail-vk1-xa2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE0E23A1564; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 06:49:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk1-xa2b.google.com with SMTP id e27so4849384vkn.2; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 06:49:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=O0Yai84Cj+cW2Sgi/Tj3jJ0rx6w5oFCV/rQNEntLZk8=; b=CUR/paQh38hLHIahuDTdULDAjjimcFpT7hl7kxk16tFTwf6WUFuZ5ZEeyiM8aymNbO CoLhGegdngrHMGyYRZVFFxHWvJ817Enx456IWGqkWvtCzdu4otRryhQkX5KPIrL764IX dfAZIVgGlAx1VGzaIcSkuZPxmjyJJrZTVtPIRs5h8V8skXhqWiYduKentd5VOPAn88gl 6bJNYoM6kTVEj8SIxSSpymsS5Hy2tD3pEoJO6x3QXP0QD+REpmVYj+IrGmlg1Bllgz7z OJ7A4oLT6+ObXHCLQYVHmkZPJglPAemKrExsKy7gVTxBR16T3KZtvjDXhk1ti8UDcNSF SvVQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O0Yai84Cj+cW2Sgi/Tj3jJ0rx6w5oFCV/rQNEntLZk8=; b=jtyaaPmNPa2h8k03W639K/x/2g5CyCPY7Z1Lc/2O5zrHIMBqyVWrXEeEYRjlxIMi9C PCE0s8nfEyAxhpIBbkHoBM1v4zAyxteXpSFL9O/G3K96S3higQ6349TTxTq2vTdgeRqG kKOm6dUu6SXmY7augIazygZcTingxHPgo8KuWScpWPA247zq73X4hUDyfgmVKCfCOvB0 voAiHBm+Of16lQs8hlag6RSbHU6UAz5PL1Dh6tqbI9Sjb39kW+KH+MFx6IwWQgvu4Wxz C4z3SpIU9WgjrX48V5Bn5pu5B68yoxH7OBWuE0GVDANEpJx3D8pNmBKd8CDpPcBbsckA ltpw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531D92qft6XagGInToEio/PvSaQREB1ZY6KDovNWUR9i0+X0xbQy l08UKUFLBXHgGn4edMbMbSJJW4oc/e8RybMHxio=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGppdmwRVaB0jla6fgFYOD5wWZ1IO+oRqlYpPQeNCuQcvmB4bnJfjneJZVbp0zQGLU7vT/fRn1uM8f2QY+1qg=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:a9c7:: with SMTP id s190mr2698306vke.5.1611067763970; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 06:49:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161105178017.4659.6792946319140372259@ietfa.amsl.com> <b6033804-7ece-e816-0dc8-f8caef8a0e96@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <b6033804-7ece-e816-0dc8-f8caef8a0e96@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 09:48:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH56j9AFLPxwwZ4g-gZj223T0y9T37Gb3UJd0TByWekiLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?w4lyaWMgVnluY2tl?= <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate@ietf.org, tls-chairs <tls-chairs@ietf.org>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c7d69905b941f18d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Ltb1GO-QacijgDSLetstpROBV_Q>
Subject: Re: [TLS] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_Yes_on_draft-ietf-tls-oldve?= =?utf-8?q?rsions-deprecate-11=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:49:28 -0000

Thank you for your review and to Stephen for making the speedy updates.

Best regards,
Kathleen

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:28 AM Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
> Hiya,
>
> On 19/01/2021 10:23, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
> > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11: Yes
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Thank you for the work put into this document.
> >
> > Special thanks to the shepherd, Sean Turner, who did a great job to
> describe
> > the WG consensus. Rob Wilton's point about minimum version is also
> important
> > and should be addressed in the abstract (even if the text is clearer in
> section
> > 1).
> >
> > Please find below some nits.
> >
> > I hope that this helps to improve the document,
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > -éric
> >
> > -- Abstract --
> > "This document, if approved, formally deprecates Transport Layer" =>
> should ",
> > if approved," be removed now from the abstract? The RFC Editor will
> probably do
> > it though.
>
> Yep, that's standard fare so fine to leave as-is since the
> RFC folks know what to do there already.
>
> >
> > -- Section 1 --
> > "deprecate these old versions." should the "these old version" be
> followed by
> > the enumeration ?
>
> Fair enough. I guess that snippet in isolation could be
> ambiguous. Also fixed in repo - [1] with diff vs. -11
> at [2]
>
> Cheers,
> S.
>
> [1]
>
> https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate/blob/master/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate.txt
> [2]
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-11.txt&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate/master/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate.txt
>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list
> > TLS@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> >
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen