Re: [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH to standards track
Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Fri, 22 May 2020 13:27 UTC
Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B160F3A0414 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 06:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y6EwD61RxMv2 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 06:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x132.google.com (mail-lf1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C13D3A03FF for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 06:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x132.google.com with SMTP id 202so6515549lfe.5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 06:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AQG1tkZZTqpnSnVvTLodIp3JaMWhu+PE1erbntxGUMU=; b=mZTCZVfTUBGB5iMz/+Vd7IeW2wuLj3Gp2D4aGJYm/gu4uC0hVdt6z2L80yTKSYXlOM XEfFeo3wPyFelalIO7DnCsJ4bqoFksc69+FQGfebG0cmtWlplfpwGCNH9R+ECDETFyuE A0YmXUf/aoykpUy1eAXNkFZm5+jiGLpFd4BDFVnf4uyixoJwNiP93bKTarE3GRdv2wLq iWMOdOYRSp78AmdWKjbC5VWv47u5wwHoaIP6HzS6AhwO12SbJ5yVg4WYgo6U8PaFW+gi 1vjIyLQBhgP7Ya4PSBS/gbbmQMyPd7QeDl0sO1VTVX7LMykwb1Ctv6/WHcjno9RL2Fmr STkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AQG1tkZZTqpnSnVvTLodIp3JaMWhu+PE1erbntxGUMU=; b=FF/Z6pkfIHtAPJlxGOrroHpY3bpdW+sN02dYbKyzu8GQAzr4CBNCRti+P6swyP/p+w jCSfNDDI8PWTihTlX6KFYK67pEQ4G0LSrrnCrE6z66StW/ONtBoA/pPPzh8FcRTfbLfw +y3qOFxaPALtCYLoEbndwGvKPtmgwyK4JCa+0uChauD+HIwVOwVAv2znRS4wJPygrQy8 oDCPc3Xze+suawqY09bvBQb5b1Iw+xi8qGuSu5O4iWs6/OKOCV0tm7vgIhxxep7RJnGM P+5v+NdWVqIU0XpTE1OcqBVOR2ZI203qPRLf/YlMHcol35mh96xinlIkyZskqHld0lH2 7EOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530f1XczJMyKvOd/n8ymr6DvIkhSz4UtIutjkfMotXHLMF+Lpd2K a/UzibHNUTYGoLYxquunU0qccX64c2K+/2cul8g0cw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVA9mOMxeZMIypSJ0tLBuP42+w0JRExsfGLS3mo9SDB9dX0op/G/UgwlK8cLgPsTzTywAA+5x4TatGEyVNegk=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:55b2:: with SMTP id y18mr7557720lfg.55.1590154070486; Fri, 22 May 2020 06:27:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <FB85C39F-D4B5-42BC-B28B-B3D3E8CEFB58@sn3rd.com> <450FE9F7-56B4-4824-A791-01B22B641800@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <450FE9F7-56B4-4824-A791-01B22B641800@akamai.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 06:27:14 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPLiisrxzqc4t2CouzcPg1pz7D5w6kgsNTO7TRjpTrX1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000829ab005a63c9835"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/n7N9tZjBDzDgXu756nE7dQb-Hpo>
Subject: Re: [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH to standards track
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 13:27:55 -0000
We have already implemented ECH (old versions) for NSS and are eager to deploy it in Firefox. We are likely to implement cTLS. -Ekr On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 6:20 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz= 40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > I am reluctant to make CTLS standards-track without a statement from > someone that they are likely to implement it. We already have such a > statement from Stephen about OpenSSL for ECH, and I'll add to that. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
- [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH to st… Sean Turner
- Re: [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH t… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH t… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH t… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH t… Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH t… Tommy Pauly
- Re: [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH t… Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] consensus call: changing cTLS and ECH t… Sean Turner