IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] consensus call: (not precluding ticket request evolution)

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Thu, 05 March 2020 03:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90E23A09C0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 19:08:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FdHjh3xgrewZ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 19:08:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from straasha.imrryr.org (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 920FC3A09C2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 19:08:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by straasha.imrryr.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 72D531AFDDF; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 22:08:47 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 22:08:47 -0500
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200305030847.GW7977@straasha.imrryr.org>
Reply-To: tls@ietf.org
References: <4E07012F-AB53-4727-A309-D8A15222A433@sn3rd.com> <0E7E2E43-CC46-488E-981E-BF8417821D85@sn3rd.com> <499f4c6f-fa95-44ea-8c44-c985e140c4e0@www.fastmail.com> <20200305004211.GP7977@straasha.imrryr.org> <f1b5df82-d0a7-4f76-a6e6-a9627b5671fc@www.fastmail.com> <20200305010602.GR7977@straasha.imrryr.org> <CACdeXiJL2ESG0HOx7QquS0zkYTw_uarOc6vXeaEwE4sz=Zi9TA@mail.gmail.com> <20200305012651.GU7977@straasha.imrryr.org> <CACdeXiLaMcWHJY+a_07JvorBO_qf=_bYXKedqs4tD8RDUKff2Q@mail.gmail.com> <20200305030407.GV7977@straasha.imrryr.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200305030407.GV7977@straasha.imrryr.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/oooCJ9tSSjO2lPu2DcVvX5eOp0g>
Subject: Re: [TLS] consensus call: (not precluding ticket request evolution)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 03:08:50 -0000

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:04:07PM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:

> No it does not, because he specifically emphasised treating 0 in the
> resumption count as issue no tickets, whereas PR#18 says that that that
> don't support reuse (perhaps all if that's the present consensus, until
> such time as reuse becomes specified) need to treat both 0 and 1 as 1.

Some sort of keyboard glitch in the above paragraph, sorry...

    s/that that that/that servers that/

-- 
    Viktor.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status