[TLS] Re: [E] Re: New Version Notification for draft-barnes-tls-this-could-have-been-an-email-00.txt

"Choyi, Vinod Kumar" <vinod.choyi@verizon.com> Tue, 24 February 2026 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=35153b2aef=vinod.choyi@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tls@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EAFBD604F0 for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:39:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.693
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.693 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=verizon.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YUBczTP_9eNn for <tls@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:39:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-0024a201.pphosted.com (mx0a-0024a201.pphosted.com [148.163.149.93]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59B5EBD604DB for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:39:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0488737.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-0024a201.pphosted.com (8.18.1.11/8.18.1.11) with ESMTP id 61OHvtHo1606684 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:38:55 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verizon.com; h= cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to; s=prodmail; bh=OIbFo8mMValbzQXPckZ1PbyK7 IFIgkK1FtaJOrgHaYY=; b=vPG+QohSWMdRxQbUpE9HLUrfI+52M0eV8Z2TWUSPq xpdaRp+gxkHNIpwJPBh6v0xQDWtdjp5pX8rhgvYscC34TlaLXXNZIwUbEAFNc6oo K8egHoyEY6HYsToIVENRoP856EqS6ULcM5P8yk1K9Y1/+UOZuLpEm/ZS7gAwXNAj U5zlhspmGDBDoLamz0tElot874DxME2Er04iqZbtz8usmSKNj0S+20aaTasfIV1w Rzsgu/jrDtUgEAABSOpsr+8cqHQAhLKVWeJgpvSuw9gCJa1qQEjiloOlmZNvL7Ja J+8l4rY2YapGQ176TdAVs/c5WQYVtQ6s530omxLAsVLOw==
Received: from mail-pj1-f72.google.com (mail-pj1-f72.google.com [209.85.216.72]) by mx0a-0024a201.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4cha6vrh95-1 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 14:38:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-pj1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-35301003062so41899380a91.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:38:55 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1771961935; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; b=ZeLDMlQAV2mJbUFR/DPvjtJ5wP96M5v7rRBocvEs0VETi9kkmHl4kFLiSvybm3feAD YaAimVFYNOK6hOPy/mKIH+1x7LaGts8eXv180+hsycyNLPPpOdYN3dI6+2Y4IFinPx4p zermTo/0bLgMcaPLibbgkwyGXFqHC+CCyYJkhlCG7kOSX2mo1B829MyUiXEXC2IaETpw mujWtOykVnZx4WJhw82UlPuN7B2zhRWawVAMa90bxK43+HVVQ3bOiOyFvTxx6/jEUYzO q3RNZmItQnqxljV2qlcUBt9IZgIMyiqs1nUjWqPvkE9GOif9tqs5imw/ZdWTVKBUBMLh LLGw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version; bh=OIbFo8mMValbzQXPckZ1PbyK7IFIgkK1FtaJOrgHaYY=; fh=2mc/0AxfHhbyOgk/94X4TyKtQNm2eGEai6PFU9Nalao=; b=Ja+gOu0wrWjPIjjCl4PyYJMG0aacAeX5lKNEKL9vYhbFcMFAzjnWvkTqKyrxqjF+j/ CySq6zs3kcwMs8zjoZZP4xSjtTVUF+F2Sw+zTi5IWTBDSlfQSfdn5W/0biLv+1c6LCac i41lEZGpbmHBBvvdCwAl6+APgDm5+SJ0ifLdJeZ3vQJFn4JcWfVroZ1cJ4AYAk+RAzHq 4HOhM0qUko/RjjYePO7wGA8V9R6F8+nSiNmbsuJapwbbQoTkNq02ZDWi3MY7PxNjWozB CCrNm5tqKo09BM0DluuMp2dQj0pEoti6F8VRgW/bFZiackfJxQkqLOY97WB+qffP3CCg 22fQ==; darn=ietf.org
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; arc=none
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1771961935; x=1772566735; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=OIbFo8mMValbzQXPckZ1PbyK7IFIgkK1FtaJOrgHaYY=; b=k8V91K7cXZnhTl1s4p2kQ6MbiqNbWlZvQcSRa2gLSYETkYBiAFtBw+9hAFVCpy7v/1 Liff2PuifniM0ZSniA2uBsGKqPEztfvZ548mZix7T9rPdnpcHDFYosNybSZMFIfWfKte JAsnT13xa1/+BHr1mSJSjrVVb0k6M1wKexORR/CPDcYr4h/PcFZRUho6VPCwsTUukTFi Zoq6FeI2Wn8YejT9twsPHwRXaEHwlHbuxXQDQLmJJVhADHyII0Zw0i8+USvLBwFl4VLa w0zRPjwfsyT9UHj9EDa9Gi6ngtLZTR4w5e8AkPxMurQtpikzC6lY035DUsfz4AtuRnpP /maQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXIO1d+OlDMS09mwpJgM4I7L7/jQ65j+ACDW1mj8RcmE7kvVTgwt2xa3fe7nbXXRI51xPU=@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwKjmeGBr5lN330i+pZkGvDatbRI6v746kE4mvhMRL9xFAXK5As LR1R1AzRzflld+Olxc7qDJ+/u2m8gjanb1MTPuldqLW2DgcUp/uylVcz58mTiEf4CI7bxHCFLeu 1aGB4cS+hRoqVBh0n44chAQXmfl9/Lt/MYDCveThUDw9wO6HWh5duHmQJ9w5UPxwVFvuRh2pah9 uIHsLCZXkqMjVjWMeQvOg=
X-Gm-Gg: ATEYQzxV0dnoDjZK+Bej5u2eNF0ON6Kjlt6XZ9X6yXc/A70r4tKexG5vs+nP1IcZCGI 4DA6JCdY80CRMudejI/LPvXEK2Ui2LKpt+gP93odldj3qKrH75sGoJOPgc0ct5dK3FUbqEqlYj9 wDRdfQTmAAJBQOz8yw/C4FG5LfpOxhx7XaImGzE7O75zplA50oP36TQoVccfnWg18utKQUk8V71 xseS0k=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:37c7:b0:341:8ac7:39b7 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-358ae8c2d42mr9485017a91.25.1771961935248; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:38:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:37c7:b0:341:8ac7:39b7 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-358ae8c2d42mr9485000a91.25.1771961934731; Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:38:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <177189438640.2182161.16660142956175423236@dt-datatracker-6ff7c68975-7k42g> <CAL02cgTob3hYSMmhOgiMiUZu0MfLRM-hV-4zQeAXp3Su=7ckCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPeSryosXZPwYnSL7U56XOd7L8vFeAOSH-1na3-k1RVsv=_EWQ@mail.gmail.com> <7CDDF045-4A74-441F-9BAC-2E119075DB38@symbolic.software> <AS5PR07MB1059672D43EA9FAF8D0B7AAE58974A@AS5PR07MB10596.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAL02cgRmSQ8KPCjLqWDejy9SGCDefyNrBuSHbLa_oaWzefOBew@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgRmSQ8KPCjLqWDejy9SGCDefyNrBuSHbLa_oaWzefOBew@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Choyi, Vinod Kumar" <vinod.choyi@verizon.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2026 11:38:42 -0800
X-Gm-Features: AaiRm53GelCwmsFcZugpX7c49CtFUnm4N5KPsan8i8IDeefaX6031ZGHHhiUePQ
Message-ID: <CAOSGJNzSD78mJ0KoA67+_TGat71BFUpFSTtcsQSeNo2Uz-CHNQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000acf230064b970911"
X-mailroute: internal
Message-ID-Hash: RXWGV63QLX2DUTJEPUFCH2OBBTBKFL2E
X-Message-ID-Hash: RXWGV63QLX2DUTJEPUFCH2OBBTBKFL2E
X-MailFrom: prvs=35153b2aef=vinod.choyi@verizon.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>, "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: [E] Re: New Version Notification for draft-barnes-tls-this-could-have-been-an-email-00.txt
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/qwd-NIJECxAzFME2ACaPtaDNzxI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Richard,

I can say with a high degree of certainty, and I agree with John that
almost all of our vendors and SDOs (3GPP, GSMA) rely on IETF RFCs
especially those pertaining to TLS, IKE/IPSEC, EAP....

Regards,
Vinod


On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 8:57 AM Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> I'm confused.  Are you saying that external SDOs aren't able to use a TLS
> ciphersuite unless the TLS WG publishes an RFC on it, even if there's a
> registered IANA code point?  Even if that's the case, it seems like a them
> problem and not an us problem.  Like, get out of your own way, man.
>
> If they need Recommended=Y, that's a different question, and one that the
> draft already accommodates.  Clearly WG action is required for that.
>
> --Richard
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 12:46 AM John Mattsson <john.mattsson=
> 40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Completely agree that this type of policy should be in the charter and
>> not in a draft.
>>
>> I am against any changes in this direction until TLS WG has tried to
>> understand the needs of external SDOs using TLS and made sure that we can
>> improve (and sustain) the applicability and suitability of the TLS family
>> of protocols for use in emerging protocols and use cases.
>>
>> At IETF 125, I would like to discuss sending an LS to SDOs relying on TLS
>> asking them if this kind of major change would work for them and if not
>> explain why.
>>
>> John
>>
>> *From: *Nadim Kobeissi <nadim@symbolic.software>
>> *Date: *Tuesday, 24 February 2026 at 11:11
>> *To: *Felix Linker <linkerfelix@gmail.com>
>> *Cc: *
>> <tls@ietf.org>
>> *Subject: *[TLS] Re: New Version Notification for
>> draft-barnes-tls-this-could-have-been-an-email-00.txt
>>
>> Yes, true!
>>
>> Nadim Kobeissi
>> Symbolic Software • https://symbolic.software
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__symbolic.software&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=T9099nIA_oiCc_COALXVeia5pNzKTBSnVzH-WnfMMEw&m=AJYcl7laPWcVJ6pE2cN4WSNYfQFPj2rQjAZ_-p5YViNk8qcy8wcSVMchK01dpqHh&s=qxZs1gQwNR2wCVilojP1E3ZozasPIKEvQjnxY2sG1xg&e=>
>>
>> On 24 Feb 2026, at 10:25 AM, Felix Linker <linkerfelix@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Sorry to be pedantic, but shouldn't the charter define what can and
>> cannot be adopted? Adding 1-2 sentences to the charter paragraph starting
>> with "The third goal..." could have the same effect as this document, but
>> be one document less.
>>
>> Best,
>> Felix
>>
>> Am Di., 24. Feb. 2026 um 01:56 Uhr schrieb Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>:
>>
>> Hi TLS folks,
>>
>> Those who have worked with me know that I hate doing unnecessary work.
>> It occurred to me that the TLS WG has been doing a lot of unnecessary work
>> on drafts that just register crypto algorithms.  This draft proposes that
>> we shouldn't do that.
>>
>> Submitted for your consideration,
>> --Richard
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>> From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>> Date: Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 2:53 PM
>> Subject: New Version Notification for
>> draft-barnes-tls-this-could-have-been-an-email-00.txt
>> To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
>>
>>
>> A new version of Internet-Draft
>> draft-barnes-tls-this-could-have-been-an-email-00.txt has been
>> successfully
>> submitted by Richard Barnes and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>>
>> Name:     draft-barnes-tls-this-could-have-been-an-email
>> Revision: 00
>> Title:    Stop Doing Cryptographic Algorithm Drafts when Email to IANA is
>> All You Need
>> Date:     2026-02-24
>> Group:    Individual Submission
>> Pages:    5
>> URL:
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-barnes-tls-this-could-have-been-an-email-00.txt
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_archive_id_draft-2Dbarnes-2Dtls-2Dthis-2Dcould-2Dhave-2Dbeen-2Dan-2Demail-2D00.txt&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=T9099nIA_oiCc_COALXVeia5pNzKTBSnVzH-WnfMMEw&m=AJYcl7laPWcVJ6pE2cN4WSNYfQFPj2rQjAZ_-p5YViNk8qcy8wcSVMchK01dpqHh&s=gWbRCh7Q2f7JV7ZX_qCn0yeOhJRSEsEwJ3ohsz_SLAo&e=>
>> Status:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barnes-tls-this-could-have-been-an-email/
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dbarnes-2Dtls-2Dthis-2Dcould-2Dhave-2Dbeen-2Dan-2Demail_&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=T9099nIA_oiCc_COALXVeia5pNzKTBSnVzH-WnfMMEw&m=AJYcl7laPWcVJ6pE2cN4WSNYfQFPj2rQjAZ_-p5YViNk8qcy8wcSVMchK01dpqHh&s=jIWJIzWuo-8UDfi8g71yj15JIvHLNKK7XePGtnTVC2g&e=>
>> HTML:
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-barnes-tls-this-could-have-been-an-email-00.html
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_archive_id_draft-2Dbarnes-2Dtls-2Dthis-2Dcould-2Dhave-2Dbeen-2Dan-2Demail-2D00.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=T9099nIA_oiCc_COALXVeia5pNzKTBSnVzH-WnfMMEw&m=AJYcl7laPWcVJ6pE2cN4WSNYfQFPj2rQjAZ_-p5YViNk8qcy8wcSVMchK01dpqHh&s=_ooZCgJJlgxksD9ozw-pJTR-DEVDSLFB4HsuQcp7WHw&e=>
>> HTMLized:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-barnes-tls-this-could-have-been-an-email
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_html_draft-2Dbarnes-2Dtls-2Dthis-2Dcould-2Dhave-2Dbeen-2Dan-2Demail&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=T9099nIA_oiCc_COALXVeia5pNzKTBSnVzH-WnfMMEw&m=AJYcl7laPWcVJ6pE2cN4WSNYfQFPj2rQjAZ_-p5YViNk8qcy8wcSVMchK01dpqHh&s=9tOu149awh8rABUp57wDgQMk4UFL6XJz_S95ncCP-wo&e=>
>>
>>
>> Abstract:
>>
>>    People keep pitching drafts to the TLS Working Group where the only
>>    thing the draft does is register a code point for a cryptographic
>>    algorithm.  Stop doing that.  It's unnecessary.  Write an email to
>>    IANA instead.
>>
>>
>>
>> The IETF Secretariat
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to tls-leave@ietf.org
>