Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] DRAFT: RFI for fonts

"Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 18 December 2014 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <rse@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C021A9042 for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:08:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wOzYmCHCh-9P for <tools-development@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:08:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759C41A9045 for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:07:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8E81E5A1E for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:07:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46Rer-jC3AIW for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:07:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Heathers-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [98.125.220.142]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C397A1E5A1D for <tools-development@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:07:12 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5492EDBA.9000907@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 07:07:38 -0800
From: "Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tools-development@ietf.org
References: <547C5A04.9000405@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <547C5A04.9000405@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-development/hvwDCcrYPLxDaCtUSLSHy841tcI
Subject: Re: [TOOLS-DEVELOPMENT] DRAFT: RFI for fonts
X-BeenThere: tools-development@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Development list server <tools-development.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-development/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-development@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-development>, <mailto:tools-development-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:08:31 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello all,

The draft has been updated to include a bit more intro.  Any other
suggestions?

- ----

- - ---
Embedded Fonts for the PDF Publication Format for RFCs
Request for Information

Description:
The RFC Editor provides editing, publishing and archiving services for
the RFC series on behalf of the Internet Engineering Task Force and the
broader Internet community.  The documents published--Internet
standards, best common practices, experimental, and informational
RFCs--need to reflect the expectations of a global community of authors,
implementors, policy makers, academics, and more (see RFC 6949
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6949.txt>).

As part of the changes required to meet current expectations, the RFC
Series Editor announced to the IETF community in 2013 the intent to
change the format for RFCs from a single, plain-text, ASCII-only format
to a format based on a canonical XML file with multiple publication
outputs.  Draft documents describing the requirements include:

•  Brownlee, N., "SVG Drawings for RFCs: SVG 1.2 RFC", Work in Progress,
draft-brownlee-svg-rfc-07, July 2014.
•  Flanagan, H., "RFC Format Framework", Work in Progress,
draft-flanagan-rfc-framework-01, September 2014.
•  Flanagan, H., "Requirements for Plain Text RFCs", Work in Progress,
draft-flanagan-plaintext-01, July 2014.
•  Flanagan, H., "The Use of Non-ASCII Characters in RFCs", Work in
Progress, draft-flanagan-nonascii-02, July 2014.
•  Hansen, T., Masinter, L., and M. Hardy, "PDF for an RFC Series Output
Document Format", Work in Progress, draft-hansen-rfc-use-of-pdf-02, July
2014.
•  Hildebrand, J. and H. Flanagan, Ed., "HyperText Markup Language
Request For Comments Format", Work in Progress,
draft-hildebrand-html-rfc-03, June 2014.
•  Hoffman, P., "The 'XML2RFC' version 3 Vocabulary", Work in Progress,
draft-hoffman-xml2rfc-10, September 2014.
•  Reschke, J., "The 'XML2RFC' version 2 Vocabulary", Work in Progress,
draft-reschke-xml2rfc-09, June 2014.
One of those outputs will be PDF/A-3 (see draft-hansen-rfc-use-of-pdf
<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hansen-rfc-use-of-pdf-03.txt>).

One particular area of concern for the project is around the question of
what fonts may be used in the PDF/A-3 format.  A requirement for the
PDF/A-3 format is that the font information for any and all fonts used
for that document be embedded within the file.  The purpose here is to
make the file as self-contained and stable as possible.   Given the
combination of needing to embed font information and allowing the use of
non-ASCII characters to meet the expectations of our authors, we have a
challenge with finding the right fonts for our use.,
 
Requirements for the fonts themselves include:

•    Serif and sans-serif fonts should be available (to meet the
requirement in <draft-hansen-rfc-use-of-pdf> for main text and headings).
•    A fixed-width font must be available for code, BNF, and any other
text that requires such a font as an aid in insuring alignment.   
•    Wide support for Unicode (which may require multiple fonts) is
necessary to support the change that allows non-ASCII characters in
RFCs, such as person names in native languages.
•    Liberal or low-cost license terms.


This RFI is seeking information on what is available, where gaps exist
such that a font might need to be acquired with a for-fee license, and
where a font might need to be designed.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUku26AAoJEER/xjINbZoGC7IH/23zFEZ/odJdWJTE1kzqguGC
xsgftdDtjoc03leIH5Hz8QJ+90MdRzc6SNSvoD0wTzlF0i3CDxff1kExQStLwQvr
mGzEEeUrNX88h2adNP0VaLpJbdK64Cx1m3Wrg1o7t0Cv2pz4/K9T/oxgo41jjIMV
2cXFD46Yj79NjVBPvg8I8RYPx0PVQ8ju6TjrWsn+y3yk492aMn96wBMmmK82szJs
L0UThemS5JAYF6W7gvsMteib6VRjK5vS15npTB+m6Ex3sNixNz1sx+VBz8+cFXpq
ENSu1wIrJF3f7hxTYkbUVx2AXilq8UUAJo3470kYb9r2RcwkdIfm4xdsLVKSD3A=
=ucxU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----