Re: [Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature

Ole Laursen <olau@iola.dk> Thu, 11 April 2013 14:46 UTC

Return-Path: <olau@iola.dk>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BCB21F8F28 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VVtOgQVACWnV for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-f174.google.com (mail-ve0-f174.google.com [209.85.128.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A4E21F8F29 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f174.google.com with SMTP id jz10so1498285veb.33 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=jsseCAEJJWRUP4BeLZfX09FkavpFjgcywZCrgZ9rT1s=; b=U4j8obiP+1+kYQd8AF28szoTLzyCdS021vCPPoaq6eDjkQJelpaAy+QidobcP4RFac H3Qyks4jrVl4OX2Zz2wnP4qVCg1pVHRNoTCYvIGXjFEEajls44HWWwOplDPkqopusaIp +PJgZcXhSvd8YIdjCcnpR0f7+NcnmHOezvbE+9Xnl1RwwGR7t3d6b3bPqakI1k/iQaNL hOUmpgpjYI8YQNIdhoaALsKcoarpry6RG7/5XlzOq23cBdh6LW7eVcfhKB7Zfiq/3YAC KiR5wO2gpSMduGAe/I+pKwcFfkDSVy8I9X881cmBdApXh04TpXVfwCkC7To8u+1Mo+Pv wDyQ==
X-Received: by 10.220.19.8 with SMTP id y8mr5310101vca.31.1365691574750; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.96.79 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 07:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5166B0E3.6070103@cisco.com>
References: <5166B0E3.6070103@cisco.com>
From: Ole Laursen <olau@iola.dk>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:45:53 +0200
Message-ID: <CANb2Ov+X6mab1ZBVFM_mJE_MHqYQbgETnu2PmdTHYq4FQPPUpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmCKGYJg3jvMGWOp2AVdEpfjyC94h7SnFtczVWxt6zqyC1N5PTSA/v7Hy/MiNZAtV3yPaD4
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:46:16 -0000

2013/4/11 Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>:
> Let's take an example
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-jose/history/
> In the From field, I have the choice between 2013-04-08, 2013-03-22, and
> 2011-09-21.
> When I check the current WG charter at
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/charters, I see 2012-08-01

It looks to me as if it is actually the same charter?

My guess is that the tools server and the Datatracker database has a
different idea of the timestamp for that charter for some reason. We
did an import when the charter tool went up - the details escape me,
but I think the Datatracker timestamp is probably the correct one in
this case.

In any case, charters actually have official sequential revision
numbers now rather than the timestamps.


Ole