IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 11 April 2013 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB24221F8BD0 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 06:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.543
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.543 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.056, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dq8F+CSATcjx for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 06:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1B621F8AB0 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 06:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3BDIOdo024832; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:18:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.60.67.87] (ams-bclaise-8916.cisco.com [10.60.67.87]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3BDHivx024786; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:17:59 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5166B7A6.7000509@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:16:22 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
References: <5166B0E3.6070103@cisco.com> <7BBBBAD4-0FFF-43E2-9D24-5178C199D119@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <7BBBBAD4-0FFF-43E2-9D24-5178C199D119@netapp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:18:26 -0000

Lars,

Yes, but what I want is a diff with 2012-08-01, which appears to be the 
one the WG uses right now according to 
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/charters

Regards, Benoit
> Exists on the tools pages, e.g.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/wg/rmcat/charter-rmcat-2013-03-13.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/wg/rmcat/charter-rmcat-2013-04-09.txt
>
> Lars
>
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 14:47, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Each time there is a new charter discussion, I want to compare the new charter proposal with the charter currently used in the WG. However, I sometimes see a mismatch in the version.
>>
>> Let's take an example
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-jose/history/
>> In the From field, I have the choice between 2013-04-08, 2013-03-22, and 2011-09-21.
>> When I check the current WG charter at http://tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/charters, I see 2012-08-01
>>
>> Can you please help.
>>
>> Regards, Benoit
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tools-discuss mailing list
>> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email