[Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature
Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 11 April 2013 12:49 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4F021F8528 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 05:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jbYV+9IgdfKk for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 05:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from av-tac-bru.cisco.com (weird-brew.cisco.com [144.254.15.118]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCAA421F8525 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 05:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned
Received: from strange-brew.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-bru.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3BCnJri021578 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:49:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.60.67.87] (ams-bclaise-8916.cisco.com [10.60.67.87]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r3BCmr1G021863; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:49:04 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5166B0E3.6070103@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:47:31 +0200
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: me <bclaise@cisco.com>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:49:21 -0000
Hi there, Each time there is a new charter discussion, I want to compare the new charter proposal with the charter currently used in the WG. However, I sometimes see a mismatch in the version. Let's take an example https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-jose/history/ In the From field, I have the choice between 2013-04-08, 2013-03-22, and 2011-09-21. When I check the current WG charter at http://tools.ietf.org/wg/jose/charters, I see 2012-08-01 Can you please help. Regards, Benoit
- [Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature Benoit Claise
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature Benoit Claise
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature Ole Laursen
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature Benoit Claise
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature Barry Leiba
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature Benoit Claise
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Charter diff feature Barry Leiba