[Tools-discuss] Bad name selection in new draft announcements

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 09 July 2012 23:33 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E5111E8153 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zc1+iI7RPxyI for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4ED211E813F for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.102] (50-1-50-97.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.50.97] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q69NXMBO065530 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:33:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 16:33:22 -0700
References: <20120709231119.23346.80365.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <E61CC0C6-49A4-4BA9-96E9-2E9FC5586160@vpnc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Bad name selection in new draft announcements
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 23:33:01 -0000

Not sure if this is a Tools Team issue or an AMS issue, but I thought I would start here.

Begin forwarded message:

> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Subject: I-D Action: draft-barnes-blocking-considerations-00.txt
> Date: July 9, 2012 4:11:19 PM PDT
> To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> 
> 
> 	Title           : Technical Considerations for Internet Service Blocking
> 	Author(s)       : Richard Barnes
>                          Matt Lepinski
>                          NLnet Labs
> 	Filename        : draft-barnes-blocking-considerations-00.txt
> 	Pages           : 4
> 	Date            : 2012-07-09

Actual text from the document:

Network Working Group                                          R. Barnes
Internet-Draft                                               M. Lepinski
Intended status: Informational                          BBN Technologies
Expires: January 10, 2013                                      A. Cooper
                                                  Center for Democracy &
                                                              Technology
                                                              O. Kolkman
                                                              NLnet Labs
                                                            July 9, 2012

Clearly, the tool cannot discern 100% of the time what is a person's name and what is a company name, but I would think that a pattern of "all names in the form 'X. Yz'" would be better than "the first two lines, and the last one too".

--Paul Hoffman