Re: [Tools-discuss] Bad name selection in new draft announcements

FWIW, this was submitted in XML as well as TXT, with correct <author> elements (though only partly filled).  

-- 
Richard L. Barnes
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)

On Monday, July 9, 2012 at 19:33, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> Not sure if this is a Tools Team issue or an AMS issue, but I thought I would start here.
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Subject: I-D Action: draft-barnes-blocking-considerations-00.txt
> > Date: July 9, 2012 4:11:19 PM PDT
> > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> > Reply-To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > 
> > 
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> > 
> > 
> > Title : Technical Considerations for Internet Service Blocking
> > Author(s) : Richard Barnes
> > Matt Lepinski
> > NLnet Labs
> > Filename : draft-barnes-blocking-considerations-00.txt
> > Pages : 4
> > Date : 2012-07-09
> > 
> 
> 
> Actual text from the document:
> 
> Network Working Group R. Barnes
> Internet-Draft M. Lepinski
> Intended status: Informational BBN Technologies
> Expires: January 10, 2013 A. Cooper
> Center for Democracy &
> Technology
> O. Kolkman
> NLnet Labs
> July 9, 2012
> 
> Clearly, the tool cannot discern 100% of the time what is a person's name and what is a company name, but I would think that a pattern of "all names in the form 'X. Yz'" would be better than "the first two lines, and the last one too".
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list
> Tools-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
> 
> 