IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Tim Polk's No Objection on draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-10: (with COMMENT)

Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com> Wed, 08 December 2010 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC563A69A4; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:18:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.408
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.191, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nfenBStcn+TF; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:18:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usaga03-in.huawei.com (usaga03-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.220]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF3E3A686B; Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:18:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga03-in [172.18.4.17]) by usaga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LD400GKXU51HA@usaga03-in.huawei.com>; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:19:49 -0600 (CST)
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) by usaga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LD400GP5U4ZV3@usaga03-in.huawei.com>; Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:19:49 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:19:47 +0000
From: Adrian Farrel <Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <20101208220838.12463.53600.idtracker@localhost>
To: 'Tim Polk' <tim.polk@nist.gov>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Message-id: <047e01cb972e$69049970$3b0dcc50$@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-language: en-gb
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AQJmloqrykE1zh/LIMQBRIyyEfEEyZJhL3PQ
References: <20101208220838.12463.53600.idtracker@localhost>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:12:32 -0800
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Tim Polk's No Objection on draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Adrian.Farrel@huawei.com
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:18:22 -0000

Folks, this subject line looks like a bug to me. 

The email thread will be about the COMMENT, not about the No Objection

Cheers
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: iesg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tim
> Polk
> Sent: 08 December 2010 22:09
> To: The IESG
> Cc: edj.etc@gmail.com; draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Tim Polk's No Objection on draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-10:
> (with COMMENT)
> 
> Tim Polk has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-proto-wgdocument-states-10: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> In section 3.1, the document state withdrawn is listed but is not defined and no
> reference is given.  Text was added that indicated this is self-explanatory, but I
> must be dense since I still don't know what it means,
> 
> I do not want to delay things further, though, and see no harm in moving forward
> with this text.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email