Re: [Tools-discuss] Finalizing the tools.ietf.org transition

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 18 June 2022 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF7AC14F735 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 12:06:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yhsClD4O_jvS for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 12:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:32::15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 310D4C14F732 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 12:06:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p5089ad4f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.173.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4LQQP00cYVzDCc3; Sat, 18 Jun 2022 21:06:12 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <4c61b746-f914-d853-54cb-54288f8a9083@nostrum.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 21:06:11 +0200
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 677271971.249921-39e59327743ae11f5c7a88c8a30be057
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EA917DE1-90E3-4325-8943-B4F04AD128BD@tzi.org>
References: <4c61b746-f914-d853-54cb-54288f8a9083@nostrum.com>
To: tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/EITKp16N5k1-O7drijNV-Yvm8-M>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Finalizing the tools.ietf.org transition
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 19:06:21 -0000

What is the best replacement for

https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml-rfcsubseries-new/reference.BCP.0100.xml

?

Grüße, Carsten