IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] draft submitted source versions

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Tue, 26 November 2019 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45CE120FCB for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:28:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bangj.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rHcJ_oBpwpxO for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:28:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D2A120FCA for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:28:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.10.124] (mta-107-13-246-59.nc.rr.com [107.13.246.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BA2B2F311; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:28:36 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bangj.com; s=201907; t=1574728116; bh=pM1jLj5jeDYK+PZTgRRB/GIvmbZ2zkrvtwjOnBypIZA=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To:From; b=W6AxxdfjxusSiOdAD9LPAsT6XzZMJR1v5l0jkOLUbaWUzNGHyAumappLBjAwiBjcA sZKDrYNaOF4vRYbPBMYT2LNk7HDogQeC2Y3iTlU9SB4I8RMmDxGN1eibJ87E3bHpWO jVlELtyOX3n6M2pWTAFCMxpgzoqSFT0l4nOBONQ1s4wTGjnhh626ReCgn5rtYZd8zl gaksdyuBAcXmGtyVjunyTt9SwcJdK6tli+myddcnG8SojSKN1Ufs/SuhXProlm/VRA uWYgsthQH8VTA3qNXYwp2fF4oRBzVaozE8yoW2aZc7Y+NyNoqf2GGmvDCs//0vLGLP h2kVC53iCO+8w==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 19:28:35 -0500
Message-Id: <2AD3F313-D831-41D0-87EC-AF722427B4AD@bangj.com>
References: <31178.1574667473@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <31178.1574667473@dooku.sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (17B111)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/Nrb2olFz3b9rzmEMlSbbO3jRATs>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] draft submitted source versions
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:28:39 -0000

> On Nov 25, 2019, at 6:57 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Tom Pusateri <pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>> Is there anyway to tell if the TXT version was created from the
>> submitted XML or was uploaded separately?
> 
>> If an XML version is submitted, is there any reason to allow DRAFT
>> AUTHORS to submit alternate versions still?
> 
> If the XML won't format because the references.* files are AWOL, then
> allowing the author to upload the TXT version lets them get around that.
> 
> This happened to me last week.

Sure but then don’t accept the XML AND the TXT. If the XML is bad, reject it and accept the TXT.

Otherwise you have two different source documents and there should be only one.

Tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email