IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] draft submitted source versions

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 27 November 2019 10:22 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED80712094E for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 02:22:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21tYY17OvJDY for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 02:22:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED09C120937 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 02:22:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1574850151; bh=G+coJQ0MIEmWJkGl8hnSGMmL2x7EQKurgnxqh/ARUgE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=X+ACxovsaj/d5G1IT+aEBWv69IzT8DiWcO7hzUV03QdQS3qqdwf2avFUTFi0GyA8q cHzqQFnmJkMVUU0nbNsJCV3T3FRDg6UXtTe3PWDfth+P8IhBnN705pvVPnssiQ9D+t eHyXwR2ilYQOBHFd4qYrR1P86L8fY4Y5j00Otcck=
X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c
Received: from [192.168.1.34] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MvbBu-1hhWev0WgQ-00siBx; Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:22:31 +0100
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
References: <31178.1574667473@dooku.sandelman.ca> <2AD3F313-D831-41D0-87EC-AF722427B4AD@bangj.com> <11131.1574848336@dooku.sandelman.ca>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-ID: <6c45cbfb-5f5e-06eb-d222-57106e957ae1@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 11:22:27 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <11131.1574848336@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:c3yOPRnFitJdo12+/y/kq0eSkzYeglY7G4IGZizn4VnAZUVMj0X owlsZDjWD1V3pp5S+wnnSP4k3fyypZNA5YnTmYyf814IxHhaQEvbAX596dV6sDq0FUT6bJt qMWS/sF0vMIQO9J1XNDRukwtP2s+a2zdt79tBBY02qvH6Zb/E62G85NT5LAoC46r24JUpf6 oVU63CqOLWTFFQnu5zwkA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:RQj+HMdinTw=:Ecy682jwotIIkSPsr4yaJH ejgiC3Z6LIoTcZMUojloviGfx2Uoe0IW1092CdNLbhloZ3gYixourYnq5Iq25X/L8pUp++WRi +ROiKIfWuQieILgb7tGf4557VfoUvQfWFktRpKTg1wK42FjMHL8XZrms4NNmHI+gvpQGYVFbk x5nuLNNQs5Do0FaO6L/4GMuGU/8UJAymYr3/IWIpHooqb2IhNZz2NS+46kZBxmbXju8Fw+TTt JBbphxIKI0cC3TpD4MuKYuxBtjfZJUDKstSNYgQYCIHQPhDUROMBoEDOng43dpHG5FHV/pa9F SgPKksUKzQovFxr3+Mgd6+axF6fEltJobrpLJBhAVG6AiXfACZdzTX77AMhA3FjKmoZhREArC 3/jc/S+zPCeUvJ6gOQ4G/RrbB29L4OUH2ywz2ZG3xy9EagvdZXdk+7jZgVszsNUcjxdF91G8M zXG5qUkhvHRXhqqUePyMHZgXFep3b5dUDdbZ8do+P0ervZ8+oQ4U/y9g8vTFNhq/7Kr3gBy07 NXa1eBshODY+a+H5ERMKTHCN/iHG4Zro1QCaBrfNG/qN3FqSN5G1nJaMdLrDQKO/qA1gkiIVw EJUf7Dvh8mHFHGrM9mAmiuRXf48CqmScmoZdddmPoeX+JkIGv6O9F+tj205nV63TuMax9AtvH /lOZS5TXVmofYeJhAT+XdAwJygVJ3ssU55jlqFm+1Lnx363cw3DSzavujdxG3/ZE6jkkHxKTd dwrVLrya/83Y+4aTfpfC8bFRizBG2D72F/EEa13H8LUWAnkyoadwpHug+7CIHCBxO2AHW3+Yc 5uXnjD6ZVzMS+G5966RUNlI/8A1YtbUhKVP4SeJS4stZHdqzyrHLVQYnFPchRg7Mb7fBt49OM IfPOPiRgYAoiWp9+ENN1n603aR3Pw6x44Grjikj8gkMmuIvGs25NvfbWrHMyTJxdFUIY7GK/+ oFaxJGzE/YRhkk3tR+RQuJL2fNW2fQUuAayrrGCo5YbnfV3+kAFvcsRy+YRTPJsSYrulEPME5 Ncoz9/E0GE/HTcng32hPkHaZPzxkinhpC5c10DU1mnXTBqE/K08Rt+cKuIciZXEcsmiPeWbj6 XVmBLcf8zzl6lI1JLIqrTPxxN3riC9e88dKfVOci22McM3n597H1eGgDtXJXL9bgfjeqeXXi3 wivGfigHj/B0W/1VIxgmkVMCFxFtJSgY0vDH/222FFsX5Ec2+AOiZpwA+eUZZQ3k5beGDP9GA /cdF/3MG+tXPkK8YTFBY9hmMJngelnADCf3PI5SWWvgoxZul3TtDf5G6e9cU=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/yyxc0Q4aHXiPdEq89c1y_cGwChQ>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] draft submitted source versions
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 10:22:44 -0000

On 27.11.2019 10:52, Michael Richardson wrote:
>
> Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> wrote:
>      >> Tom Pusateri <pusateri=40bangj.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>      >>> Is there anyway to tell if the TXT version was created from the
>      >>> submitted XML or was uploaded separately?
>      >>
>      >>> If an XML version is submitted, is there any reason to allow DRAFT
>      >>> AUTHORS to submit alternate versions still?
>      >>
>      >> If the XML won't format because the references.* files are AWOL, then
>      >> allowing the author to upload the TXT version lets them get around that.
>      >>
>      >> This happened to me last week.
>
>      > Sure but then don’t accept the XML AND the TXT. If the XML is bad,
>      > reject it and accept the TXT.
>
>      > Otherwise you have two different source documents and there should be only one.
>
> Yes, I see this problem, but I see a bigger problem of archival.
> ...

Archiving XML with external dependencies is problematic anyway :-) (ok,
archival not necessary, but assuming that the archived document can be
used to re-create the same output files)

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email