Re: [Tools-discuss] Question on how chatlogs appear in the meeting links

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Sun, 24 March 2024 16:27 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFDDC14F5EF for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 09:27:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.115
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.115 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_DISCARD=1.8, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1vZ5QjAOne0V for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 09:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74B8BC14F5EB for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 09:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] ([47.186.48.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.18.1/8.18.1) with ESMTPSA id 42OGRIGH062615 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 24 Mar 2024 11:27:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1711297639; bh=ZkLnamOE8mcZiG7A4X1trE5RT5kVmLiM6mzQ96BZ0+8=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=lt9v40ywuaqqz7oGO4D7YourDyKDjMuFpoWSD46bDSk23oIfsD9RaS9rCeD64I9Gh TdZnNehfF1ipUM0k+4/B1WIqB1VWr7jcb0DCC6epg2DDFfM8/5jUjFZcPtJL+xGnEl ik4tABz2Oj+Z8U9W6AmpDNfUEWWJNISly9yfH8y4=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.48.51] claimed to be [192.168.1.102]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------5aVhqkmXxtj9BPA8fnvXrrAW"
Message-ID: <45d205b9-46ed-4069-8e03-6b0ba00ee54b@nostrum.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 11:27:13 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <CADyWQ+Fpnp+q02hV2F7R3Dn0YtUY1TB6JpGz+b6bzMvg=uj8-g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Autocrypt: addr=rjsparks@nostrum.com; keydata= xsDNBFx4PQwBDADIIJqFKIeYNmVR3iH8YnNqwApV+ci83VqFaPg0UXZAZ1utH/2O2LOLJKmV Ol11+lOSfH4OJgpARt37PWbqfG2TzzGfEucRBPMAV8TEDmzKL+7/OUMLEoPeexgxz6ADxK2Q ACKKzHhF30y4fx2fn9rYZrCvYHV9HDKcfFotNLna0U6P6wu70L0mT2hcjQgZ7+8HSZCpK2XG PTya1mEiMklH6+UHfcTLoAxd3chQiseRi19/TQZZCD3LuuaGFWyTIeF9ZNWV9yL0HQeb/XMs tmZnObSSHSUbZwn5PR9Uf+3iW7jdG5JuXBvNbDpAHfLyPXRqxErM/nCLrbwGB6AgNSKFCwkL lb3uxsGFWcOt6sedrjixoVUO2k4zQWVnCUCwFHGrgIxUK24dI8oqydGPctXAKj5VqoCVJBv6 4JxSpiR+V8fl3A8gksBUnuIMLNlRjB5RAgZaSUpaOkXsWUBA8Z75wQWoIzkJIeMm29w2l1kB B9kGMdyiXGr2JV8VQZ4lAscAEQEAAc0kUm9iZXJ0IFNwYXJrcyA8cmpzcGFya3NAbm9zdHJ1 bS5jb20+wsEUBBMBCAA+FiEEGNywdGDCHUYBwWN3bipqV3X5ExgFAmXhDnYCGwMFCQ0rmNQF CwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQbipqV3X5ExiEpwwAknrYjNHDI2l50IC1lpQB SnmCLvuu4pEESpRaBx1Te7vZBHr740dMbKQv/ZYYekw/NfFfoq2Ptguz5BXHwtyx3hKKjBUA U/rP62bl+x77yTJ0+I5k2hJ1p1DWNqXHWK3SEM0IUvjWpMGlfXPu7iVYCBGPKBDglQ4GWpzU HmSAX/8Zww6+ZbrXM0VgA+hLSHivyHextX4mJwoLRcuY99ecvkdWwFnKoDlEsKozdv9NW+QT h1rFvAtXf2ZCGwIveAMJPbHbRY3uFVp+oMvBbP7m5teffB8Ki5kuO1Y1Wqd9UPhiVDZmUuyC PXymQErskbOB6DcNSSFH7ZHuLM4V+zyziYWTT6foBv0ynA+a3Ofxo+rKPVHLybZlO9bQcI0Q TIE8yT0oqd3kWMaMIyrKZURVUpzcDgRnx6ujckLLyAC1H8L0tuntPwZOo5PAq3P7SUiWlc0L 5HbA0L//BE6eeWn6U3xOgaJNF2+YRVICNtWpXcR3Mr4k1uXW4JkE7lyoufbnzsDNBFx4PQwB DAC03e1kk41e9Z9FuVW8UKWIkVUBeH3gfJMsb94d/c0cqBMRw5rulSY7+U76rw4AXo792LZn ydjDfoL0GQxGqkrZh397Sn9P/sLCb5I+wC14251nkmh5tmU2sQqCk+g9nykcE/NJft/zFkeb HHCKAosK6glO+W0YPHc/k7nXt/fLz7dMRpFpmqFXWjeN2VtwKr9znMg9+iX6XfgAJPMdDNH8 fn30Cp5TIsn5WCI70+JztgvfjFhD15Eb3rtDdOfOydjGCV2ZVxfM8ECmc8Z3DrThyiC2M3uo 2Y50rs6MH+TmVCtpHkISnH7B+80Vy2SC60K9l2xgCaezN1SlkQy3ZpprzcDrNTI8FcJa/UUM ayMGvSDGEGuHZRaNUyXP3jQ8oss+067axmNr5vgjpf01kmE1RJtiGEDWmCr8u1SbVQjdax6C pDqq3RKoX2ZVGLtkdDYZbsqSq4TgmFukoijWRbLxsFBdeEgruTViWRw4PKZav0piLxrhHUGI m6F6JFngapUAEQEAAcLA/AQYAQgAJhYhBBjcsHRgwh1GAcFjd24qald1+RMYBQJl4Q52AhsM BQkNK5jUAAoJEG4qald1+RMYaCML/jp+3W9OedMRVk5XQ3Urxu7g09qaeAfBAArLlE7F13Xt WuGUN7JwZ8hZt8Rsx1+Uz/Zq2TIPjl8PmgIqCSkuvZrxacr+drYARtO00Af71qHVoh4gZTae iOwEuOGhhtCVI3vvKLMDv1ex0scvD4rJTsIk/zqEDCJNDVOf09Szj0CW0vJOYxrIV0sG/UoM 7Ui5/eB4tlN5AFIXuTJzo6BzaUAJVut74Ss2i93qwtwjGw44iEqPVhqKMCDYuB9+bm13ft+H Vr7viRZobd+60NTWrfZhkpmzhb4Qiib9qXhrUoa2EXqVOIy+LMQoiwjF9/iK+5FSA18c52FP ODkDgkica826W9AnBasS6gXQr0bO1BCJu84Fp2RQcjB4IFP+sKVoN3EZTByyUKK4NnSLF3lJ /G+vQhisnuJS+e+emZ8UxZBOK8upAhrhHJj0Wju2W0uTQTxlBME0/uNsvA/KaudLNhlQiUYN 7Fl3rswvQk/iD+utnQdWJbRgIsqesNXbQCOimQ==
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+Fpnp+q02hV2F7R3Dn0YtUY1TB6JpGz+b6bzMvg=uj8-g@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/YFPMjumNW0VOLEMQVFfT8NIGTj4>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Question on how chatlogs appear in the meeting links
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 16:27:28 -0000

In both cases you're looking at the json which isn't really intended to 
be the people readable format. If you want to read it manually, jq will 
help.

I'll ask MeetEcho what the difference was between the posts that led to 
those documents.

But for reading, it's better to look at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/chatlog-119-dnsop-202403181530/00/

and

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/chatlog-119-deleg-202403190930/00/

RjS

On 3/23/24 2:13 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> I noticed that not all chat logs end up looking the same.  For 
> example, this log from a dnsop session is nicely formatted:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/chatlog-119-dnsop-202403181530-00
>
> While this one from deleg session is not:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/chatlog-119-deleg-202403190930-00
>
> Are the logs processed by hand somehow?
>
> I've seen a few of the latter format,  hence my question.
>
> thanks
> tim
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tools-discuss mailing list -Tools-discuss@ietf.org  -https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss