Re: [Tools-discuss] Question on how chatlogs appear in the meeting links

To followup I opened https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/7260
to reflect the agenda should generate the chat log links with the trailing
/

Thanks for pointing that out Robert.

tim

On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 1:53 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Robert - thanks, I was able to read with jq.
>
> If the links you posted are the more correct one (and they look better to
> me),
> then we should update the links on
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/agenda/
> None of the "Chat Logs" links have the trailing slash.
>
> thanks
>
> tim
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 12:27 PM Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
> wrote:
>
>> In both cases you're looking at the json which isn't really intended to
>> be the people readable format. If you want to read it manually, jq will
>> help.
>>
>> I'll ask MeetEcho what the difference was between the posts that led to
>> those documents.
>>
>> But for reading, it's better to look at:
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/chatlog-119-dnsop-202403181530/00/
>>
>> and
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/chatlog-119-deleg-202403190930/00/
>>
>> RjS
>> On 3/23/24 2:13 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>>
>>
>> I noticed that not all chat logs end up looking the same.  For example,
>> this log from a dnsop session is nicely formatted:
>>
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/chatlog-119-dnsop-202403181530-00
>>
>> While this one from deleg session is not:
>>
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/chatlog-119-deleg-202403190930-00
>>
>> Are the logs processed by hand somehow?
>>
>> I've seen a few of the latter format,  hence my question.
>>
>> thanks
>> tim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________
>> Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org - https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
>>
>>