Re: [Tools-discuss] Question on how chatlogs appear in the meeting links
Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 24 March 2024 17:54 UTC
Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CA9C14F6FB for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 10:54:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.104
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.104 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lnBcDKB8AlhR for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 10:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 600F6C14F5F7 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 10:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5684db9147dso4198112a12.2 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 10:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1711302846; x=1711907646; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OUuDsb0W6Jb2Wj19NnOhN4K86koOR/GNQaf8LFG94FM=; b=M5CozFFxrOpC+kSibBC/QbuBmoBMl4DPI0CpXGOP8ijuAklEnjFj+IyOoM0NEISYC4 WmKWhqBiHb6QNL1FRAkE55g2Lmk0sR/DYV3SOU2pDH6Q7AN0ejC7J4NQ45xOIfEq4fbU 4gYxvBmCS2GmMtEJbqrjKcLphAz1DGYlv9yWNdPTVQe5LfVryEaE88l2jAKBc95iDgZg 4Ux5Ht9IvCc2CzSm9xTv2MZbq+Iz/qxY3UmPvmPpfTGNORRMkvcrNCJzglyffHbbmt3Y kNscAwOcM7T8vNJ/pi5kJ5le8JWt0RLFyIbrgN5VJ1rNtILg91/p7HHObywac2vrpNxZ +IIA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711302846; x=1711907646; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=OUuDsb0W6Jb2Wj19NnOhN4K86koOR/GNQaf8LFG94FM=; b=JiXZhqOH3NuIt4qjFFEMIeFQmxkwtQmew/TY2hoPA+8TB/Z5QLvzroXjiiuhdQvH11 ORxV9XEggYrfpwpwjkaZNXwdYqKteNBtLp80mwVOo3f6vRcdIZnN2ZPXGwPwUs8hPyMr zaIk5vZhSs1r+WCTmlO+8LaZ6Nn3hdQtPHfAs8+edai//MN0jGW+LVPpjQ301O0QoolL opB8IXJNQ5+vplI8S86PoeddNYYkc5Z1Ns7OIrHFmhTMxoOFoyj9FaPPt99feXDbqrKc c5CZ/dHUUB6U4yCuBhkxikrsnOYMN0nASPevrSczhPABzNaSfGb+pzidPspRKqMlj6J9 pqOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzFix7IIHCBgxMFSQT9LfPvCxbfWopuw3CKLMpl2tcLgkwy368X yZTB/hJMnRJ9SJCan12jdtu5+nYEF79YBpANnO8bwtI6bzvSQLchULH/D7sji/iAkrHmB8rx7CN dUajoJbvv7tBkq9FuLAySw58ZgoeD40lqlGs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF/mrlh+6jOVyvatWf7qH2T9QJq9gZT/JPY4Lhrx4E9i6PFRtKJ/CfGe9iDyyW+X2eiwdFNO0CCnl5HwVZhPSI=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:8751:0:b0:567:4694:159 with SMTP id 17-20020a508751000000b0056746940159mr3228962edv.26.1711302845953; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 10:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+Fpnp+q02hV2F7R3Dn0YtUY1TB6JpGz+b6bzMvg=uj8-g@mail.gmail.com> <45d205b9-46ed-4069-8e03-6b0ba00ee54b@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <45d205b9-46ed-4069-8e03-6b0ba00ee54b@nostrum.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 13:53:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+FY0DPkfOgfbDT5kcimMR-t1Yzkcb0LsYL6=_AdTVZSMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Cc: Tools Team Discussion <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003c84b306146bbeeb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/u97_WvinPOZyxQ6UHW3kL6JM6w0>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Question on how chatlogs appear in the meeting links
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 17:54:13 -0000
Robert - thanks, I was able to read with jq. If the links you posted are the more correct one (and they look better to me), then we should update the links on https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/agenda/ None of the "Chat Logs" links have the trailing slash. thanks tim On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 12:27 PM Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote: > In both cases you're looking at the json which isn't really intended to be > the people readable format. If you want to read it manually, jq will help. > > I'll ask MeetEcho what the difference was between the posts that led to > those documents. > > But for reading, it's better to look at: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/chatlog-119-dnsop-202403181530/00/ > > and > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/chatlog-119-deleg-202403190930/00/ > > RjS > On 3/23/24 2:13 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote: > > > I noticed that not all chat logs end up looking the same. For example, > this log from a dnsop session is nicely formatted: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/chatlog-119-dnsop-202403181530-00 > > While this one from deleg session is not: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/119/materials/chatlog-119-deleg-202403190930-00 > > Are the logs processed by hand somehow? > > I've seen a few of the latter format, hence my question. > > thanks > tim > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Tools-discuss mailing list - Tools-discuss@ietf.org - https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss > >
- [Tools-discuss] Question on how chatlogs appear i… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Question on how chatlogs appe… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Question on how chatlogs appe… Tim Wicinski
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Question on how chatlogs appe… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Tools-discuss] Question on how chatlogs appe… Tim Wicinski