IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Draft email aliases aren't forever

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Wed, 11 May 2022 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BF2C157B5F for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2022 15:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=E3giE6bH; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=EM89RrxX
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8bZSkgeZeWyh for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 May 2022 15:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 626F5C157B47 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2022 15:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08725C0110 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2022 18:50:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 11 May 2022 18:50:14 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1652309414; x=1652395814; bh=ou2pEwlPCC y0rc9+PiYWViW+WOakFmB9STjvc/SFi3o=; b=E3giE6bHsWY2VP89leKfC/IrIQ dGy03G4/TYQUfvznCgY57Qw6Zqo2jgiGDvW0l/LhxIxmLYFl7wPTrgnjuNPWws7C SZTcNLNv9Gsr56AtjBVmUPMYMQKLaJSenzzS9vI5GM2H0YlJVtuUzWpycQlPUP8/ +q/+qdZkpq93AaXaUYjBcLvxZSpfd3G/0zIQt1aaj6H5SStAnszlBHS4mMwIa0/6 4bT2CESfVftiOLLI+w05kC4mve06SZYxwuGEHYaVeFr3oBmZy9xASM2EVIoyNwmA FbLjUPURLSupeDHHaWNbDTwArSfNYvNAq91hmGfy2x+slqBA2p/4BVzB+8yg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1652309414; x= 1652395814; bh=ou2pEwlPCCy0rc9+PiYWViW+WOakFmB9STjvc/SFi3o=; b=E M89RrxXHebfO+7KdQtopbmIQ+RRZIIpxzEQHzCu8LDasBjOsTZ6WUhkZcijtl2mb dXBwvuk2/DpBK/wX0YIzQ320vDUwXeUiB6TAS8DXV4yuUjVgudpIe7wFK6bycvA4 k+LL7hT4kjd3e50acg4ZQm+YUf4OiuLPlqFi5Uembnk0/u2kPjKiAlFCD2aUhshn 5r44ib8VIkH8soOPBSAlieA19DT8ez6cdu0kmCSd6sM3XEx/bwzcTopsQOS2Io3x 1jXo6qkddrNrME0HR+gzMEmJMgMeA1MKcRx5o4Ix6lW8Meky8VN+I6KsNqJKZrXf +6CjPw/eFDvw62oWiqFgQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:pj18YpOfv0T3XK2c8xja-PL289OMrJdw_hOqxRDDD-Yr7rgmr-M5_w> <xme:pj18Yr8fb0zZDVz-cW4QqnfYRiE0NwRjXz4_BFHB4GsDrnM8oKFjdgy1RkkytxMnK Ax4PrctBdjbbxqRZmY>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrgeeigddugecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohif vghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeetueeikedtkeelfeekve fhkeffvedvvefgkefgleeugfdvjeejgeffieegtdejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgep tdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pj18YoR2Sj_GjP-oSdPxMc2HIEIHgTTQ0VYsONyIruyXIue8EEMdMA> <xmx:pj18Ylt6wte3sNBrtEp6ifW_tI9Cjh3zOIMae2BjF7ELxl-BLwk_jg> <xmx:pj18Yhef44kQBZJsmwsw71p0ZVNOvU1xuBChUq0auY6ZOcnfJq8QuA> <xmx:pj18YrpJX8rVm6x95cuQlpiKilhhDKWx3kjzrDvf2PiYyLyj-5WKCA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 82D64234006B; Wed, 11 May 2022 18:50:14 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-591-gfe6c3a2700-fm-20220427.001-gfe6c3a27
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <909f0bd3-a284-448c-a989-e8d2cdb589c2@beta.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <89281238-831A-492D-9636-FBDA50B5BA24@gmail.com>
References: <61077a2a-ab86-41c8-bef1-db339bc3623d@beta.fastmail.com> <0EC9C228-C6E4-40C5-A063-869314A50A76@tzi.org> <b1966fa9-fdd9-27b9-6faa-e88f6311e35f@sit.fraunhofer.de> <573cb4e3-f80f-3d6c-b935-13599e9c5ae6@nostrum.com> <89281238-831A-492D-9636-FBDA50B5BA24@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 08:49:53 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: tools-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/_dKCae8q7b79o9kW_GM12ajMj7E>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Draft email aliases aren't forever
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 22:50:20 -0000

On Thu, May 12, 2022, at 02:46, Bob Hinden wrote:
> How hard is it to hand copy the addresses from the authors section for 
> old expired drafts, or do some Internet searches?

In this case >> 4 times harder.  I didn't search, though I should have, but that would increase the multiplier a great deal.  I wasn't looking for a new job, just to notify people of a security vulnerability in their (proposed) protocol as a courtesy.

On Thu, May 12, 2022, at 02:39, Robert Sparks wrote:
> The list of aliases for the mailserver to handle becomes _very_ long and 
> the processing time becomes noticeable.

I guess that is one way to fix the bug.  Is there an index missing on that database table?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email