IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] How to get updated early/wglc review status for documents on datatracker datatracker

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Thu, 10 August 2023 16:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C65C14CE25 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O2ogsBmO9_oZ for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD903C14CEFC for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09453898C; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:16:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id I1EIoCibomXU; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:16:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:b241:6fff:fe09:a92b]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1013898B; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:16:05 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1691684165; bh=cP1ezEOlqMxkg/fjGuMJft6tC29lkN37L4AV7ZCMZdg=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=w5lU6jBBwHT56cBQOSjqlsTwYWGhIb4biNkjmApgHen4uukzYsO/Szl+lFsOht2lQ KRavMtNRweE+ODohQwfgjD8mJT71qLY8yRsplYV51q5KsmETaM1hJDqFjWnXtPbLCB e04CWh3Ouq0BbAftYVv5ttAESj49LmThyaNKguGaPJHEBL8oEKEPPh1rdsLFzgrytN YaePUNAUmPdckhA+nel0NyHOv5DCHsFg4jk8wOr7ssDzRXg4AUqo/jjT99CCgx8ouj qbtruS+YnSC/pg4kKKmAsjssYVhwoWSNc6o69FIP3xOrMb585IFcPAhReCC3BQ2dV8 6iWfP+YHqg8pg==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78867238; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:16:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, Mehmet Ersue <mersue@gmail.com>, 'Toerless Eckert' <tte@cs.fau.de>, tools-discuss@ietf.org, dromasca@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <c964f6d4-3372-7b46-7e43-703d3edcca6f@nostrum.com>
References: <64d4295f.170a0220.98534.05d4@mx.google.com> <c964f6d4-3372-7b46-7e43-703d3edcca6f@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:16:05 -0400
Message-ID: <25239.1691684165@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/aTMtDmozohGzewuAWuRtVO-vSh0>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] How to get updated early/wglc review status for documents on datatracker datatracker
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:16:12 -0000

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
    > I want to check to see if two different things being
    > discussed. Toerless is wanting to make a review result change status. I
    > _think_ Mehmet is saying that the automated yang check result for the
    > draft should change. Do I have that right?

That's not wrong, but it's also not exactly right.
(I think that lack of YANG should probably cause the YANG check to go unset,
if that's a state it can be in)

I think that Toerless would have gotten better results with Mehmet had he
asked Mehmet to confirm that the YANG has properly moved from
draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae to draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis.

(three other documents lost their YANG.  If you are YANG-involved and want
details of that, I can point you at IETF116 presentations)


{it's me. I'm the problem}

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email