Re: [Tools-discuss] How to get updated early/wglc review status for documents on datatracker datatracker

[[e-mail]]

> I think that Toerless would have gotten better results with Mehmet had he asked Mehmet to confirm that the YANG has properly moved from draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae to draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis.

Toerless actually wants to get the YANG status of the draft set to "Green" so that people can assume there is no issue. 
IMO after removing the YANG module there should be no YANG status necessary for this draft.

If indeed it is indispensable to keep the historic YANG reviews made on the outdated draft versions on the datatracker page 
I could do a workaround by commenting on the last YANG review made and setting the YANG status to "Ready". 
This would make the YANG status "Green" however this looks like an ugly hack in my eyes.

BTW: The drafts in discussion are:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-anima-constrained-voucher/

Mehmet

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Richardson <[e-mail]> 
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2023 6:16 PM
To: Robert Sparks <[e-mail]>; Mehmet Ersue <[e-mail]>; 'Toerless Eckert' <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] How to get updated early/wglc review status for documents on datatracker datatracker


Robert Sparks <[e-mail]> wrote:
    > I want to check to see if two different things being
    > discussed. Toerless is wanting to make a review result change status. I
    > _think_ Mehmet is saying that the automated yang check result for the
    > draft should change. Do I have that right?

That's not wrong, but it's also not exactly right.
(I think that lack of YANG should probably cause the YANG check to go unset, if that's a state it can be in)

I think that Toerless would have gotten better results with Mehmet had he asked Mehmet to confirm that the YANG has properly moved from draft-ietf-anima-brski-ae to draft-ietf-anima-rfc8366bis.

(three other documents lost their YANG.  If you are YANG-involved and want details of that, I can point you at IETF116 presentations)


{it's me. I'm the problem}

--
Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide