Re: [Tools-discuss] updated Word template and tools
Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Tue, 13 February 2007 17:08 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HH195-00068R-Lp; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:08:47 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HH194-00067n-HG for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:08:46 -0500
Received: from vapor.isi.edu ([128.9.64.64]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HH193-0000Fd-2c for tools-discuss@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 12:08:46 -0500
Received: from [128.9.168.63] (bet.isi.edu [128.9.168.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1DH8Sd3022104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:08:34 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <45D1F065.70501@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:07:49 -0800
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (Windows/20070116)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] updated Word template and tools
References: <442C83AF.3020107@isi.edu> <45D0F02D.6050309@isi.edu> <45D1B2D9.30506@zurich.ibm.com> <45D1D8BE.4050608@isi.edu> <45D1E05A.3020305@zurich.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <45D1E05A.3020305@zurich.ibm.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95b
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 6ffdee8af20de249c24731d8414917d3
Cc: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tools-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1831219695=="
Errors-To: tools-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Joe, > > I don't see the analogy with any BCPs - they are rules, whereas > xml2rfc, your template, and the various nroff templates still around > are just tools - very useful tools - but are they archival material? The tools no. The RFCs describing the tools - presumably in a non-versionspecific way - yes. > I would ask the same question of RFC2629 if it came up today; in fact > it's out of date, which sort of proves my point. I'm sure there are other > RFCs that are also in this class. That's why we invented IONs, in fact. Who's "we", and where are IONs? Joe > > Brian > > On 2007-02-13 16:26, Joe Touch wrote: >> Although the template can continue to be updated to track boilerplate, >> the description of what the template is and how it was designed should >> be as stable as many other RFCs. >> >> I.e., to the extent that the BCP78 docs are RFCs, this should as well. >> If we did have a series solely for RFC administration purposes, then >> both should be moved there. >> >> In summary, I intend to submit this for publication as an Informational >> RFC. That is the meaning behind "final". >> >> Joe >> >> Brian E Carpenter wrote: >>> Joe, >>> >>> Thanks for this. >>> >>> I'm not sure anything like this is ever truly 'final' though. >>> It seems like the sort of updatable materal that IONs are aimed >>> at. >>> >>> Brian >>> >>> On 2007-02-12 23:54, Joe Touch wrote: >>>> Hi, all, >>>> >>>> A new version of my Word template is now available; it includes: >>>> >>>> - moved boilerplate to regular text to make it easier >>>> for authors to track the evolution of BCP 78 >>>> - added Intended status: header item >>>> - added acknowledgement of use of this template >>>> >>>> updated ID: >>>> http://www.isi.edu/touch/pubs/draft-touch-msword-template-v2.0-05.txt >>>> >>>> updated template: >>>> http://www.isi.edu/touch/tools/2-Word-v2.0.template.dot >>>> (this is always the most up-to-date one, if you just want to link it >>>> in) >>>> >>>> perl post-processor: >>>> http://www.isi.edu/touch/tools/2-Word-post-v2.0.pl >>>> (same thing - always updated) >>>> >>>> Feedback would be appreciated. This version appears to be final, and >>>> will likely be submitted for publication as an RFC. Comments welcome. >>>> >>>> Joe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tools-discuss mailing list >>>> Tools-discuss@ietf.org >>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tools-discuss mailing list >> Tools-discuss@ietf.org >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
_______________________________________________ Tools-discuss mailing list Tools-discuss@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss
- [Tools-discuss] updated Word template and tools Joe Touch
- [Tools-discuss] updated Word template and tools Joe Touch
- Re: [Tools-discuss] updated Word template and too… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] updated Word template and too… Joe Touch
- Re: [Tools-discuss] updated Word template and too… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] updated Word template and too… Joe Touch
- Re: [Tools-discuss] updated Word template and too… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] updated Word template and too… Joe Touch
- Re: [Tools-discuss] updated Word template and too… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Tools-discuss] updated Word template and too… Joe Touch
- Re: [Tools-discuss] updated Word template and too… Brian E Carpenter