IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] How to change the state of a document in new datatracker?

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 25 April 2022 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B39D3A1A7C; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.688
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.688 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7gIZKE0E8iPg; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 378933A1A7D; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 07:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.114] ([47.186.48.51]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 23PEwp6R050021 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:58:52 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1650898732; bh=3dv4YX2rBW7+IfL3GR59bvOji8FlJC+fXF5lQMHWKO0=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=cwEFbVALvlNIoHEezf+bmR5uRgOzYVUUd4KJlkiRLxYe9jFiyX/ZuOaEpJyraNXiM KVPQ8HAO6/Vc/iwItmZZyBmx5lU6x6Y9iBDPTdzQLYmCYuo+pLzGmtRvm+MoYYnMvC QuYvsPnx3lIYWP1K8Y5lgIW1XccnMD9RX8fJ6bh0=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.48.51] claimed to be [192.168.1.114]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------qqQUYxRpT4Mvv0qIQAmICYYF"
Message-ID: <1154c86a-c832-4737-a8d3-53fcd54ae3c5@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:58:46 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>, tools-discuss <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Cc: Working Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
References: <m25ymxi7kp.fsf@ja.int.chopps.org> <350763f3-17a8-f102-03bd-3637ab4d81c5@isode.com> <BYAPR08MB48726636588FF8206093E384B3F89@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR08MB48726636588FF8206093E384B3F89@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/gJhT7-PHj3p7YUJONdsNOOgVFtk>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] How to change the state of a document in new datatracker?
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 14:59:00 -0000

The intent was that nothing changed with this facelift other than the 
html - the functionality (except for some bugfixes) remained the same.

I'll review to make sure these particular places didn't regress.

RjS

On 4/25/22 9:19 AM, Susan Hares wrote:
>
> Alexey:
>
> Did you get rid of the ability to put in the state: Candidate for 
> adoption?  If so, could you put it back?
>
> IDR like LSR has lots of drafts that ask for adoption.   Prior to 
> adoption, we need to do IPR checks. We let people know that they are 
> in the queue for adoption by setting this state.
>
> Could you also put back the ability to sort on state on the related 
> Internet-Drafts for a WG?
>
> Could you also send a link on where to send bugs for the new datatracker?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sue
>
> *From:* WGChairs <wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Alexey 
> Melnikov
> *Sent:* Monday, April 25, 2022 10:14 AM
> *To:* Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>; tools-discuss 
> <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
> *Cc:* Working Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: How to change the state of a document in new datatracker?
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> On 25/04/2022 14:59, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
> >
>
> > I can't see how to change the state of the following document:
>
> >
>
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fox-lsr-ospf-terminology/
>
> >
>
> > To "WG Adoption Call issued" (or whatever it is). The only action-like
>
> > item I see is a button labeled "Adopt" which is premature at this point.
>
> >
>
> > How do I update the state of this document?
>
> "Adopt" is what you want. This will move the document to the state you
>
> require. After 2 weeks (or however long) call you can declare consensus
>
> and either mark the document as adopted or as not adopted.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Alexey
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email