IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] Strange IDnits behavior (or is it something else?)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 22 September 2020 10:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8133D3A15FA for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 03:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XGdUeACc6M6H for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 03:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35B9B3A0B74 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 03:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:d505:2b78:dd03:a6b1] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:d505:2b78:dd03:a6b1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C15F1600E64; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:32:56 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1600770777; bh=G/MjQfKqPxiOsvq7EcExj3R53M0yLvHKVFZmjkCOF7w=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=pxVvpJbnHqQnK+NNZ3Zm9VOUrT3q+ysNXP4CmlZm3Fi9fNWUYCVk7Oihi7oQWmqKx qz/p7nsNS85nW7oTG2fuLQANRAT/hMt/2PbnWaTEz/qxVZMvkD4H0wjEk1op6z8u2S c+YxsvDafUXyrCLPTO5h8HONH0O8UDezGvxbwrwE=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <0B6004B7-8BBD-4A22-A155-7E8D47F6727D@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_294B4021-4B2A-4EE5-BCF5-688639AF155F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:32:54 +0300
In-Reply-To: <3f032b28-3159-355e-db2c-8be749fad47e@gmx.de>
Cc: tools-discuss@ietf.org
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <CAKKJt-eeYvfOuFwqTtXeHrYjnw3hQR_u8hb4sc9c1zSi5oXK0Q@mail.gmail.com> <3f032b28-3159-355e-db2c-8be749fad47e@gmx.de>
X-MailScanner-ID: C15F1600E64.A25E3
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/i8ZqQvftlzDr0lyygIP-661DOCo>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] Strange IDnits behavior (or is it something else?)
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:33:06 -0000

On 2020-9-22, at 11:29, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> ...maybe caused by xml2rfc v3's change in date format in the boilerplate?

Yep. I have a fix in https://github.com/larseggert/idnits/pull/1/files, but since I have no idea what the sources for the actual repo are, I don't know what to do with that patch...

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email