IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tools-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 25 June 2016 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCE812B03C for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:05:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JMXfqr7l9jGJ for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32E1412B04E for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id r190so14123666wmr.0 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:05:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DwRkLY2i3oJbOw4k2JJM7LyVBbE+qHpdwgM8ImxplJc=; b=I7KtsfCQzwGrWxmqrUQYrnFImmWRzticcRco3askCfaGSUbH29ICQjsc+sSJ7NwBbD slLSX4thj+pf72jALUBhIH4nbCCygMV6eaODEF4HCbeylZ75J6M7AABLIHS2RYD3dWkl /OmImBzLMGu68DChxfB5qarqdS+yDOtijdMFfmHttjs6LQ/18NVlnt+qKJVqhnlMKMLv rjob+DnSkMH3Poxm3pgLjpWCQ69Fty950gJ07hDklwLDvpitf0PzlKF0AIOFFfYxE7en QmNgLyQa6XZ/t2QIwOdgssL4ku5NywqGldJR4JOUwzXN/pUouyKdMni2BFcwTRbN9O1P Zh/g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DwRkLY2i3oJbOw4k2JJM7LyVBbE+qHpdwgM8ImxplJc=; b=Q7DJ0I/9MiizP78x52RB1QCmN+3XZmeMX9x5dRvIkS3gtiu06ZVYJ/Aviac1S3E1gr VcAVKrSVlDkq4dHFDqmJIKbEOJJdB89OO3mw8ASQDUx4vWHEUEiJMKxff5EaygthsjTf 1FooSVorTyPbM2pMfunBRUCESu326innKcqWRgp9TN4YlTcA+tPovJRUE+Jf2FrZdPxu hILDUHyVAE1CzF1uqmM75vHzW7JpEQ0BsxY/5LttyMs3Jy4NtpYVtbf2IyHNNt5Q/1rh DOUu6jW683cWB71M9Si782qjPz85FgUwG0c4QKczRbtymBzGQJarAS8c+FX8OYsT01qX VkiA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIVb9qKom/gdAgOWXrBFNYZAgYjSg7x/SXwHRZ3+J0nuXGSB/RXhxogPLCKM8vwvQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.21.39 with SMTP id s7mr8960484wje.24.1466877899679; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.9] (bzq-109-67-2-59.red.bezeqint.net. [109.67.2.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w81sm2611438wmg.20.2016.06.25.11.04.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 25 Jun 2016 11:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20160625175547.17196.37166.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org, tools-discuss@ietf.org
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20160625175547.17196.37166.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <576EC7C4.6010905@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 21:04:52 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160625175547.17196.37166.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/kCHblrWlxumY0DH23zY1kij1Q3U>
Subject: [Tools-discuss] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 18:05:03 -0000

Hi,

I have posted a short draft that proposes to open the "tools" version of 
RFCs up, by allowing readers can annotate them. The goal is to provide 
us with feedback and encourage discussion of these documents outside the 
"walls" of the IETF.

If you will, this is another way to reach out to the broader community, 
as this recent draft [1] suggests.

I would appreciate your comments!

Thanks,
	Yaron


[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-ietf-trends-and-observations-00

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: New Version Notification for 
draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:55:47 -0700
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>


A new version of I-D, draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Yaron Sheffer and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations
Revision:	00
Title:		Requesting Comments: Enabling Readers to Annotate RFCs
Document date:	2016-06-25
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		6
URL: 
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt
Status: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations/
Htmlized: 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00


Abstract:
    RFCs were initially intended as, literally, requests for comments.
    Since then, they have turned into standards documents, with a
    peculiar process to report errors and a highly onerous process to
    actually have the RFC modified/republished.  Non-IETF participants
    are typically unaware of any way to provide feedback to published
    RFCs, other than direct email to the listed authors.  This is very
    different from the way many web specifications are developed today
    and arguably leads to the value of published RFCs diminishing over
    time.  This document proposes an experiment to remedy this situation
    through the deployment of web annotations.

 



Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email