IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-discuss] [rfc-i] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt

Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> Sun, 26 June 2016 13:02 UTC

Return-Path: <lrosenth@adobe.com>
X-Original-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A411312B055 for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=adobe.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r37NiaDpx2LR for <tools-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:02:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0620.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::620]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1589212B060 for <tools-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 06:02:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adobe.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=YiAzbKKvuuDDZeMnWXv7GTLgZIvCWqgvDyz0GmKGrfI=; b=FvC8p4W5kivu1cFNO+VRqjUQCTLMFAP2tkpcN6k8Y4hIQMvbzluzuv/hfxZOaZNLE6hYPE42RbTYoCu6YNGIExzDjiSzqQvHd53uriTW47RIjOy2dFUhdknO2W8n/mJTSJITHQMPXXPbT1UhUFh5R5ZrOt+kVrpNPhEtUGA4IqQ=
Received: from BLUPR0201MB1505.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.163.119.16) by BLUPR0201MB1505.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.163.119.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.517.8; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 13:02:24 +0000
Received: from BLUPR0201MB1505.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.119.16]) by BLUPR0201MB1505.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.119.16]) with mapi id 15.01.0517.016; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 13:02:24 +0000
From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>, "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>, "tools-discuss@ietf.org" <tools-discuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rfc-i] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRzwwby+qDzdzQH0O4SGZe2r5OYp/7dM4A
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 13:02:23 +0000
Message-ID: <77E7F840-7485-4D1E-A00D-2B5B3D33B763@adobe.com>
References: <20160625175547.17196.37166.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <576EC7C4.6010905@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <576EC7C4.6010905@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.17.0.160611
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=lrosenth@adobe.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [2601:80:4103:99a0:1610:9fff:fed8:e65f]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f1dadb5f-ddaa-4b9e-c140-08d39dc21de3
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR0201MB1505; 6:T+xbEuirvTbjE0hEsK8zmAtADhHFaXHr0OkfCBWrsX5dJXy7CtD1Ovz0BrT41UFdXuoasYitHx6bstgCJc6hiD26GbQ6gCPSb/o6pVvVAmf0ty8laRSUWGE8e2zxkbiUsKzCclmZlQucSDXmKtFZRDXlBRr84Dq5mcG7VNOrfNHqFfpF6PLqtoF2De3oZCwpbVUmTtaqsJcd/tAM618D1TvrwA6ynFL9t1Xcd3dl2PolUiisvIKnUVtjFm6PvoeoGB0BrQF3FuC+v9Y8VmsZn7uMUkesqnT7erQR7zfhT2F28sVJniql7mvU8swK6AuB/3Y7vM/+FiHlCMOsM7dQUS4qliXNJ2/n5QL9lF4+7aY=; 5:Ag6IINmuf9VsjO0RGknY1ijjXNq+IAupDNwH8HPNXAJ/v3N4J3r0KHASROUboKuEBiifVEBs/4ZKKKRzhoF31vFAI6Jxq98GhhFLWv4i7yEltqNVDbiL0ddvhJ45fYV6IKXpWxffV6jxNJDJmWRRkA==; 24:VkEuQh9VqAZOKzNzk4fWyDLRbEjoY1TAUJRhW3MbOh7b02ue9IgWjk/dJdGVbAPiY2HLhNmkI5G6dmnKHlrTGaeX+YM+b9LNy+TpjZiG3ws=; 7:5+AKOE5lugk9Kem25UZsfVQGXq41yTAg+rRKF4W23GTTGaU8Q5owUx7AIscO0E6idrGc+w0bLF/9d+hdcIqLWspCeNQWn6QKFX7/IDxccFSfvp16FC0GeEcK1S30p5cFYlCed7+W0xr/XQxSY5ogfe6FlJOlywj/12iu6OEGt9OEbdVBs4Yt8fsr7qOI74gQJNA1UlP/0tdjscWw5LW7ne3eGHiRRxDjlG+cYFcc4foH5l/9J6l7x2I6V+Du/DRz
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR0201MB1505;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR0201MB150533037906F33524CB05E0CD200@BLUPR0201MB1505.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(176510541525296);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BLUPR0201MB1505; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR0201MB1505;
x-forefront-prvs: 0985DA2459
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(7916002)(377454003)(199003)(2473001)(189002)(377424004)(24454002)(81156014)(81166006)(36756003)(2501003)(2201001)(106116001)(5001770100001)(97736004)(68736007)(105586002)(11100500001)(33656002)(230783001)(8936002)(99286002)(7736002)(2906002)(8676002)(106356001)(305945005)(50986999)(54356999)(10400500002)(83506001)(10090500001)(83716003)(586003)(82746002)(122556002)(76176999)(86362001)(3280700002)(4001350100001)(2900100001)(107886002)(5002640100001)(92566002)(2950100001)(19580395003)(15975445007)(189998001)(77096005)(87936001)(6116002)(102836003)(3660700001)(7846002)(15650500001)(19580405001)(101416001)(3826002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR0201MB1505; H:BLUPR0201MB1505.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; CAT:NONE; LANG:en; CAT:NONE;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: adobe.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <AAD05D056714224282FF2BDF6EAAAFA3@namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: adobe.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Jun 2016 13:02:23.9062 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: fa7b1b5a-7b34-4387-94ae-d2c178decee1
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR0201MB1505
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/qVak0kSPozLQ-hxfxo1NyVSXcnw>
Subject: Re: [Tools-discuss] [rfc-i] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: tools-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Tools Discussion <tools-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-discuss>, <mailto:tools-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2016 13:02:48 -0000

As an experiment, this seems perfectly reasonable.  (not sure what the “shipping” solution would look like – but can’t hurt anything to try out)

Leonard

On 6/25/16, 2:04 PM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Yaron Sheffer" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org on behalf of yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

I have posted a short draft that proposes to open the "tools" version of 
RFCs up, by allowing readers can annotate them. The goal is to provide 
us with feedback and encourage discussion of these documents outside the 
"walls" of the IETF.

If you will, this is another way to reach out to the broader community, 
as this recent draft [1] suggests.

I would appreciate your comments!

Thanks,
	Yaron


[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-ietf-trends-and-observations-00

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: New Version Notification for 
draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:55:47 -0700
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>


A new version of I-D, draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt
has been successfully submitted by Yaron Sheffer and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations
Revision:	00
Title:		Requesting Comments: Enabling Readers to Annotate RFCs
Document date:	2016-06-25
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		6
URL: 
https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt
Status: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations/
Htmlized: 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00


Abstract:
    RFCs were initially intended as, literally, requests for comments.
    Since then, they have turned into standards documents, with a
    peculiar process to report errors and a highly onerous process to
    actually have the RFC modified/republished.  Non-IETF participants
    are typically unaware of any way to provide feedback to published
    RFCs, other than direct email to the listed authors.  This is very
    different from the way many web specifications are developed today
    and arguably leads to the value of published RFCs diminishing over
    time.  This document proposes an experiment to remedy this situation
    through the deployment of web annotations.

 



Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat



_______________________________________________
rfc-interest mailing list
rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email