Re: [Tools-discuss] [rfc-i] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt

And that that IETF would run the server and thus “own” the comments, would also seem to be reasonable as well.

We would also need to reconcile the various formats – in case someone commented on the PDF and another person onteh HTML – you’d want to see both.

Leonard

On 6/27/16, 1:20 AM, "Yaron Sheffer" <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Leonard,

I think an initial "shipping" solution would be mostly around identity: 
allowing users to register with their IETF or some other, federated 
identity instead of having to register with an external service.

Thanks,
	Yaron

On 26/06/16 16:02, Leonard Rosenthol wrote:
> As an experiment, this seems perfectly reasonable.  (not sure what the “shipping” solution would look like – but can’t hurt anything to try out)
>
> Leonard
>
> On 6/25/16, 2:04 PM, "rfc-interest on behalf of Yaron Sheffer" <rfc-interest-bounces@rfc-editor.org on behalf of yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have posted a short draft that proposes to open the "tools" version of
> RFCs up, by allowing readers can annotate them. The goal is to provide
> us with feedback and encourage discussion of these documents outside the
> "walls" of the IETF.
>
> If you will, this is another way to reach out to the broader community,
> as this recent draft [1] suggests.
>
> I would appreciate your comments!
>
> Thanks,
> 	Yaron
>
>
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-ietf-trends-and-observations-00
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: New Version Notification for
> draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt
> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 10:55:47 -0700
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Yaron Sheffer and posted to the
> IETF repository.
>
> Name:		draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations
> Revision:	00
> Title:		Requesting Comments: Enabling Readers to Annotate RFCs
> Document date:	2016-06-25
> Group:		Individual Submission
> Pages:		6
> URL:
> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00.txt
> Status:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations/
> Htmlized:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sheffer-ietf-rfc-annotations-00
>
>
> Abstract:
>      RFCs were initially intended as, literally, requests for comments.
>      Since then, they have turned into standards documents, with a
>      peculiar process to report errors and a highly onerous process to
>      actually have the RFC modified/republished.  Non-IETF participants
>      are typically unaware of any way to provide feedback to published
>      RFCs, other than direct email to the listed authors.  This is very
>      different from the way many web specifications are developed today
>      and arguably leads to the value of published RFCs diminishing over
>      time.  This document proposes an experiment to remedy this situation
>      through the deployment of web annotations.
>
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rfc-interest mailing list
> rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-interest
>
>