IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-implementation] Draft 2 (was Rough draft of message to the community re Zulip and Matrix)

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Mon, 28 September 2020 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590073A1078 for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:29:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.292
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.292 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mtk4BioQhmds for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E55DC3A1072 for <tools-implementation@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 11:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 08SISwVd002392 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <tools-implementation@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:29:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1601317740; bh=IF4YY4J/Q4ZeA2rXCrBHjjA9eLsee2a4aW2w3uBm6X4=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QkWNzvGs4Q5W9ochLkEgFmo/9m/okNevR79uo+mPDk9l4brKj/mTKjTc1Bz3H+CwP ea7d/MkyaLGZZnd0AimN+ZZxQad9293uIJaoIaDqKKSGCrDHPeKDrYOnCwixZh8vR7 FBMy34I9RQLXKwNPXDe5MVA7BKpLiMbxHRe9j7VA=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
To: tools-implementation@ietf.org
References: <ebcf4e32-99f3-5c70-a58a-6cabcd86095b@amsl.com> <1978b20a-b829-85a9-a250-6944652df040@amsl.com> <2dfef357-d4b4-a6e8-d95b-85ceb78e764a@nostrum.com> <ba51f60c-b481-5b35-31d0-a575faaef5be@amsl.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <2eda6bcb-d321-f2e1-0199-20400bda2376@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:28:56 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ba51f60c-b481-5b35-31d0-a575faaef5be@amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-implementation/-QL6qCNECJn1X-LN8ECXjdLHy7s>
Subject: Re: [Tools-implementation] Draft 2 (was Rough draft of message to the community re Zulip and Matrix)
X-BeenThere: tools-implementation@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Implementation <tools-implementation.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-implementation/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-implementation@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 18:29:04 -0000

Sounds good to me.

On 9/28/20 1:24 PM, Glen wrote:
> On 9/28/2020 10:27, Robert Sparks wrote:
>>> Maybe we should do a separate alias?
>> Russ found "glen@amsl.com" surprising. I suspect other people will as 
>> well. Something @ietf.org seems less likely to trigger that surprise. 
>> Requests for help will likely come to you in any case. I think it's 
>> your choice whether you want them to be ticketed or not. It would be 
>> good to know, at the end, how much volume there was (though if the 
>> volume is high, I suspect we'll change strategies anyhow).
>
> Okay, I am going to be AFK for about 90 minutes.  If there are no 
> objections, I will just change the address to "ietf-action@ietf.org", 
> since that's what the community will likely expect.
>
> I expect I will have to restart Zulip for the change to be picked up; 
> given the many moving parts, I will just reboot the dedicated instance.
>
> Glen
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email