IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tools-implementation] Fwd: Organization of the mail archives

Glen <glen@amsl.com> Tue, 15 September 2020 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <glen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DDC3A1657 for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tu20zEehmw0R for <tools-implementation@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:59:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49743A160D for <tools-implementation@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:59:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CFEC3C2DFB; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2603:3024:15a1:78e0:c1b6:d7dd:a558:afbd] (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:15a1:78e0:c1b6:d7dd:a558:afbd]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 587F63C13CF; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
To: tools-implementation@ietf.org
References: <8ec50ff6-471b-f698-5e61-b6034509e930@nostrum.com> <7e213352-f0ba-6a84-0d26-1d2cb669f5f5@nostrum.com>
Cc: Ryan Cross <rcross@amsl.com>
From: Glen <glen@amsl.com>
Organization: AMS
Message-ID: <39e9687a-5fe6-195f-b6e2-61a435320fa7@amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 10:59:09 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.2.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7e213352-f0ba-6a84-0d26-1d2cb669f5f5@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-implementation/uDKoTxJ5YN0r6LoJFSdJuPLTR6k>
Subject: Re: [Tools-implementation] Fwd: Organization of the mail archives
X-BeenThere: tools-implementation@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Tools Implementation <tools-implementation.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tools-implementation/>
List-Post: <mailto:tools-implementation@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-implementation>, <mailto:tools-implementation-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 17:59:22 -0000

On 9/15/2020 09:58, Robert Sparks wrote:
> Continuing this in the context of today's conversation.
> After the cleanup described below, we are/will-be left with:
> /a/mailarch/data/archive as the _authoritative_ store.
> /a/mailarch/data/mbox_archive/public as an automatically generated set 
> of mbox files generated from the authoritative store.
> Should we plan to move the first to be under /doc and the second to be 
> under /derived?
> RjS

No objection.

I have a weak preference for leaving data which is only used by a single 
package in place under /a/packagename, because it will help us identify 
what things can be easily severed.  However, I realize that the mailarch 
data is also accessed by the ISODE IMAP server, so the proposal to move 
them under /data and /derived seems correct.

Glen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email