IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Thu, 18 September 2014 03:56 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDD01A00F3 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 20:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.153
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.153 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.652, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JGpsLZM7tPoP for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 20:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 067791A006F for <tram@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 20:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=840; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1411012575; x=1412222175; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=CxHXRJGgFnpcpT/0GTTTGNSDp1Rytcc84AkBqCzcFRU=; b=ItP4H3z9+SBK5eVyMdmeSWh0gh/szB3a8qKEshIBuPSgIM8zjbAoFRvG OLmEnv7UbzR9Hr9bhHWwxYEktopaLhMLC8RSfFp5bV5Rfenb1u4cGDcDw G/ZK9X0ZceJ7LQPa5in23tl4XMpmlbEUyQ0ro051GoTaAXNv7k7Sntegu Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkFAHNWGlStJV2T/2dsb2JhbABhgw1TVwTJSYdNAYEMFgF5hAMBAQEDATo/BQsCAQgYHhAhESUCBAENBYgqAwkIDbg5DYcnAReNSoF6MweDLoEdAQSRToQ3hHeCEIFgjSaGQoNebIFIgQIBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,544,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="78963699"
Received: from rcdn-core-11.cisco.com ([173.37.93.147]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2014 03:56:15 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core-11.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s8I3uD3P029980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 18 Sep 2014 03:56:13 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.78]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:56:13 -0500
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
Thread-Topic: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00
Thread-Index: AQHP0h1KcDYu+ea/iEGE0aPHlSxTTZwGmJAA
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 03:56:13 +0000
Message-ID: <4F093538-232F-4407-A57F-1FC2226DA810@cisco.com>
References: <CANO7kWCiU275DnNsJ7pn8ALjpV5qVViCQUQS8VOgubArGYG_5g@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXWLhAggZwP3ZhDsDMnx6ueYOjrMw12=tD9xEryx_5Z0A@mail.gmail.com> <C7219C6D-A887-4E05-8869-996F8B32D810@cisco.com> <CABkgnnV_u32ZLpoKxX7Z7ExbJAEOXgR9BgiZnRg7vEWFhaZ4rw@mail.gmail.com> <AEE73BD1-650C-41C5-A904-CD8E0E754EB3@cisco.com> <CABkgnnV5_anUGTcBFqfZOPSJ_GgT3XLsq2R1_1_dvUVb9yt8jQ@mail.gmail.com> <D03E1542.4DDBC%praspati@cisco.com> <CABkgnnXFtovkGegh5nieS5CWxUg6q8MQNm=V4od=J=BukkbPvA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXFtovkGegh5nieS5CWxUg6q8MQNm=V4od=J=BukkbPvA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.132.54]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <DF0CCCF4786E4E4384FA94510008633A@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/3lTaiMHiezgA4Ph6MnT4nyhVDkI
Cc: "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 03:56:16 -0000

Hi Martin & Simon - 

Just published an -03 clarifying that the "stun" label will function
exclusively as a fallback label for when one of the other usage-specific
labels do not apply.  

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tram-alpn-03

In your estimation are we ready for WGLC now?

Cheers,

Gonzalo


On Sep 16, 2014, at 10:15 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 16 September 2014 03:58, Prashanth Patil (praspati)
> <praspati@cisco.com> wrote:
>> We've published a revision incorporating feedback provided on this thread.
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tram-alpn-02. Let us know if you
>> believe this is now WGLC-ready.
> 
> I'm still not convinced by the use case for identifying "stun".
> 
> At a minimum, remove: "(e.g., any labels starting with "stun.")"

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email