IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00

Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com> Thu, 18 September 2014 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sperreault@jive.com>
X-Original-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tram@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351AE1A0373 for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ji7jA4MVnGqR for <tram@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E0EA1A0503 for <tram@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id p9so927237lbv.17 for <tram@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3d2y+wnnDsdYQZSwLPoR5C5PpoRnDkAKgxqxAlSmo2U=; b=FkbzEBcIovcDK+x0AHAo2eSTqJbE48KEXTF938iF9nZzDezgcKNDqfW25nIYiXIk5K M+YsTE7djfilgM6cTvocJBGFwZVM576r531MByLakZJ5OnQ7DRukjcd1hu/gH/bDZHBK mUTD2Epo85ijpRvS++jpWRoYykxkAbBJhpiYJ6eWaur1iY8IV4ibBruLjWshIBnEPDAZ hcoYlDA3y7Z9tJ0x7rDZKtocVPudD7En0Fdeiyuz3136KM4/A13nRFFmuh8QkNDb9vwM GPQctGNk+ggNFx45r5mfsfjTwluA/+8fSClgG4i4w2VNhY2OQrb0t1gdmCY+hv4pJGPC +Bew==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnRkXVCyQU4Gbw5+vi2JV6JK6ziwZr97lMZh9QC0OLarWr/qECfgvEBpXxXE3YZCkikcchX
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.170.167 with SMTP id an7mr1032230lac.94.1411059651752; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.137.6 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 10:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <541B050C.8090403@acm.org>
References: <CANO7kWCiU275DnNsJ7pn8ALjpV5qVViCQUQS8VOgubArGYG_5g@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnXWLhAggZwP3ZhDsDMnx6ueYOjrMw12=tD9xEryx_5Z0A@mail.gmail.com> <C7219C6D-A887-4E05-8869-996F8B32D810@cisco.com> <CABkgnnV_u32ZLpoKxX7Z7ExbJAEOXgR9BgiZnRg7vEWFhaZ4rw@mail.gmail.com> <AEE73BD1-650C-41C5-A904-CD8E0E754EB3@cisco.com> <CABkgnnV5_anUGTcBFqfZOPSJ_GgT3XLsq2R1_1_dvUVb9yt8jQ@mail.gmail.com> <D03E1542.4DDBC%praspati@cisco.com> <CABkgnnXFtovkGegh5nieS5CWxUg6q8MQNm=V4od=J=BukkbPvA@mail.gmail.com> <4F093538-232F-4407-A57F-1FC2226DA810@cisco.com> <CANO7kWC6D9EwKXH2rwBMdp5ML4-1+ijg99YphXV1wxMA9ppH2g@mail.gmail.com> <541B050C.8090403@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:00:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CANO7kWDMN3TqQM_RTMKra=USt77SefdWwjT3qrFQmbYu4OD99Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Simon Perreault <sperreault@jive.com>
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0117690f4cc8d9050359ed5a"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tram/CrecWOobhIe5cLpnLvS4tpsbj9s
Cc: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>, "tram@ietf.org" <tram@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tram] WGLC draft-ietf-tram-alpn-00
X-BeenThere: tram@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussing the creation of a Turn Revised And Modernized \(TRAM\) WG, which goal is to consolidate the various initiatives to update TURN and STUN." <tram.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tram/>
List-Post: <mailto:tram@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tram>, <mailto:tram-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 17:02:28 -0000

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
wrote:

> > I just realized something: I assumed that "stun.nat-discovery" referred
> to
> > RFC 5780, but now I see in the following paragraph that there is
> explicitly
> > no label assigned to that usage. So I'm wondering what
> "stun.nat-discovery"
> > is used for...
> >
>
> RFC 7350 section 4.1.


Ah, thanks!

Please add this reference to the label description!

Thanks,
Simon

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email