IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Fresh issues!

Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com> Thu, 16 March 2017 01:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D2313013D for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sleevi.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cp-hHuk9dnZx for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a98.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB6D612F24E for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a98.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a98.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4006060002A3B for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sleevi.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; s=sleevi.com; bh=wT0lid97TZm5Qcoyf6D8MZv8Dlw=; b= Qb92kDGLzCBshLJ5ksxGnItZbtiomK9XN2j6F2E7hTTPdbhJFJlGpqxs8EeaY/Eu 2vdT+aYsPdGb5ntaXb+WYSiRudmlwy8WLAISZKyYiN4Dy/650K/gXgjH7LpF2Qiv bbaGL/wATLNFjXYHVXJYmCZJ1wsqm6Z1uWRygTNXABY=
Received: from mail-lf0-f42.google.com (mail-lf0-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ryan@sleevi.com) by homiemail-a98.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C07D60002A38 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:46:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-f42.google.com with SMTP id y193so14160703lfd.3 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H22KXjjO3eFYosCWqX8enTBot4LYLNBZ59G2wwUAVNiuGKl9G+iOMo3p7pr9d1TR8i+iHNTk+J4s2jwqw==
X-Received: by 10.46.22.85 with SMTP id 21mr2093545ljw.113.1489628772211; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.193.197 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:46:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgQ5M6jD39JLxviqSbtyTzn--PQxS6xzhR7nqxT-RRBoLw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL02cgTU1j5ZNcy29fnKBnbr2Vu0Y15D5jJd0iNSZdyxtQM20w@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgRSvBrkAZJkeZtxJEctHAOw-v_b=On6+SfpmW0DFo14mA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgRCK8arZXSXxymNE2UyKuCpuzTXw_Hc1ac+sFBscp14_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQxELvNKU3sePs2OkugG-pr8L7ZD3tiw8Ni_yks2ByoKA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQJMN8r-O_xFqindUzWbhq_p=qcnu_J+xE5H7rkaxJyvQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQ39WTgOBwO1XWVk7SvuK2nOQ_ruQewF+R2Z9mri2oOrA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgTcPywtGHoOWP+b0p+4QYPS9zRKAzAvTeqyApqcaUqE1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgT3-dyny2J+jznhf0=PNDNqw4wgHcgvs2u7sac6zstzSw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgSTqcA2ZBO-D1WENh8gcfVb+9=5=P+uV+KssEF_CRsiAw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQ5M6jD39JLxviqSbtyTzn--PQxS6xzhR7nqxT-RRBoLw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:46:11 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAErg=HFxcCOBqnZLPsT+miAy6EC7gv17mGN48LfBoitE3hoX6g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAErg=HFxcCOBqnZLPsT+miAy6EC7gv17mGN48LfBoitE3hoX6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Cc: Trans <trans@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045fc1a0d0a4a0054acf392c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/2t68odJlD0G7UzNXNN6uHrdnEoc>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Fresh issues!
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 01:46:15 -0000

That's a whole lot of issues, and some of them questionably justified. It
also seems non-ideal to suggest that these issues be closed without
discussion on the list, as that's not very transparent.

Given WGLC has completed, and it seems some of them fundamentally redefine
the protocol or implementation, do you have a suggested priority of issues
to discuss, from those you view as most clearly justified to least clearly
justified?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email