IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Trans] Fresh issues!

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Thu, 16 March 2017 02:28 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1529612F24E for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 19:28:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8L7nKQ5mE5x for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 19:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A52A129C68 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 19:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id u132so24397046wmg.0 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 19:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=j8VbbV0s8AEi+4NAazA4cdvNAQUa4iJK4KMFt1b1JCs=; b=Frf+TUJqIAoUqPhsXQFuHG7VVFDJwNGqJCzpAtHXm/fS898RbGkLeS2A4buwdlCTzZ z1XOPQLNZYHgKNorkGSUff5yjgO8DoYnyDwEKk7JZS4JiTNC2YGovs/1n44n6yzaCUR8 YnM+w83ESaziaEODiNEZQ7mmNXZMAeT43JU8aZGIjXnSnopKcqiUkJbpOoDS/uwmmQVf iUwTppt3p5Ut9PRmZ/ajYUpRzO8sxVcfzw5gjek11FhbRt9Y63t0KPFzHpdEVVQBu0Ey B1WPum4vYsB/aLK0RufO7/L1U/6qMZXRGgGrctBFp5gdJUpNSlLh3aSrWk8fvf5uXvYQ T8NA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=j8VbbV0s8AEi+4NAazA4cdvNAQUa4iJK4KMFt1b1JCs=; b=tuJughzWA9OmUJg5eB+zUcLgNd+jSW+/IHZE7NOgb4MbSgnYYKclsV0Wf4j/hvGP5f dovKss5IIVp7A/NN+qvcuBzWZSCpN2DYevZcRkvT09l+LWiaksEWDB6C/N2VpHcGkDlA W0dqmZzGup73s9oo009k8WCrq4jTbv+cvDEqmu2NfJnMHjI4losFK0z/NK2jqvrh5mjO /CmDkkj0ru57i8Xzt+7QXbhJgNtGELBgnFXT8JbCHwW3lbpQGLjNI241M6484YTj7K9G trK3ONHk8kfScWdZD/5ZEN6bqKd/9VURARQCm/VfbneeyAwAzZdO1PCDkw4mM085cq4P mUag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0T+XVE7uxVsAcUOnSIcdiUy3el2EbXQFfAxAybo9B57Ihg3gNS56mrJSLe0PMn3kZ+KZ8RYcwIBbOM0Q==
X-Received: by 10.28.156.69 with SMTP id f66mr21249842wme.56.1489631327665; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 19:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.31.2 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 19:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAErg=HFxcCOBqnZLPsT+miAy6EC7gv17mGN48LfBoitE3hoX6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL02cgTU1j5ZNcy29fnKBnbr2Vu0Y15D5jJd0iNSZdyxtQM20w@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgRSvBrkAZJkeZtxJEctHAOw-v_b=On6+SfpmW0DFo14mA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgRCK8arZXSXxymNE2UyKuCpuzTXw_Hc1ac+sFBscp14_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQxELvNKU3sePs2OkugG-pr8L7ZD3tiw8Ni_yks2ByoKA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQJMN8r-O_xFqindUzWbhq_p=qcnu_J+xE5H7rkaxJyvQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQ39WTgOBwO1XWVk7SvuK2nOQ_ruQewF+R2Z9mri2oOrA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgTcPywtGHoOWP+b0p+4QYPS9zRKAzAvTeqyApqcaUqE1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgT3-dyny2J+jznhf0=PNDNqw4wgHcgvs2u7sac6zstzSw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgSTqcA2ZBO-D1WENh8gcfVb+9=5=P+uV+KssEF_CRsiAw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQ5M6jD39JLxviqSbtyTzn--PQxS6xzhR7nqxT-RRBoLw@mail.gmail.com> <CAErg=HFxcCOBqnZLPsT+miAy6EC7gv17mGN48LfBoitE3hoX6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 22:28:47 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQOZV6nM=6OxNiRZ1M=3Ou2_TDBymFs2zPbRdL11a1rGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com>
Cc: Trans <trans@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b7e2a21d2c2054acfd27f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/82i18lpZCcdpCc3WslaW-MprUE8>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Fresh issues!
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 02:28:51 -0000

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Ryan Sleevi <ryan-ietf@sleevi.com> wrote:

> That's a whole lot of issues, and some of them questionably justified. It
> also seems non-ideal to suggest that these issues be closed without
> discussion on the list, as that's not very transparent.
>

I certainly didn't mean to imply that these would be closed without
discussion.  The idea of meeting up was just to get concrete proposals in
front of the WG faster.



> Given WGLC has completed, and it seems some of them fundamentally redefine
> the protocol or implementation, do you have a suggested priority of issues
> to discuss, from those you view as most clearly justified to least clearly
> justified?
>

I think you're over-stating the impacts here.  The overall shape of the
protocol is untouched by these proposals, and many of them are just cleanup
for a document that's made it through 25 revisions.

But I'm happy to provide some taxonomy / plan of attack.  I'll send
something around tomorrow.

--Richard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email