IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Trans] Fresh issues!

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Wed, 15 March 2017 22:34 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FE3129C49 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ay2KTuzddD2n for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F726129C31 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id u132so21952319wmg.0 for <trans@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ipv-sx.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=x2bgwUZr4TmksArZ8Vkm6Jh2ZIjD+91p0K7ypD5HHso=; b=rYgmksKz+dvRRY9Zls5nyYBz+4Ela0VPET7x+u3kAvwelgmI+eaeKMfkHOgnXdbdYc 8PvqojrWduf8+k9uqKT4oMyEiKvI/rulxguYQDwLVtzi24Dnt2iyBCHISf/BY1NknO9L j4pmTIivhTwX6xqJXsMhSpkT6HzebJ4rUA80evxv5NuXo3jxM4Z9q5oNL5p7S8WfjpyM CWixcL3O1p6lFV52u6OtvZcBExWoo3v9LV5tQb+Yc5hEs4F9coTQrHyjbSBz8c5v84Rs CTy8lDRWhIAxguCPkTaYTQesgMYej66HXlgXSG/75BMknDihqZ6pNgyWeAfwWLjIlziz jqNA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=x2bgwUZr4TmksArZ8Vkm6Jh2ZIjD+91p0K7ypD5HHso=; b=IjoR7IL62zkR+CXjnuAwxu5xSZXuCjJ4sXlwTLxHWlcNi3tLZUQc/6ha1tYIRcIqmS F6zJWjBvYAat8A5xngIraWDQAIt94CfKGnoguPNSLSfUqMphFFK6/0vv8bx4rsNlsKyA ZxGNLmGwsbEemPkQARHCG/F50t71rwQaFm1dsJq539OEu7kM5kt48LXBFsxYW3MPXKMP jQQ+PG72bE7xAeXFxJf+ZVnFp/ATvWfYSu46tYI8SH+7W/coOI6qo2Ko5gz2cAmob8q8 vQ6bKtrXUnk5Ie52VzEvJ1iUySQ2QH4tUoumrKefDMAJYUR4rl3O3w0QgzDeF2mfZC5F W57g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0A06FS51n7njGjAXJ/QpzHrwsEgqrvxcblYzg2+ISPYZcuN67zzhaNhtX3Zdoj5FdsBaiienhUml3c6Q==
X-Received: by 10.28.93.68 with SMTP id r65mr6757862wmb.133.1489617239479; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.31.2 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.31.2 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgSTqcA2ZBO-D1WENh8gcfVb+9=5=P+uV+KssEF_CRsiAw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL02cgTU1j5ZNcy29fnKBnbr2Vu0Y15D5jJd0iNSZdyxtQM20w@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgRSvBrkAZJkeZtxJEctHAOw-v_b=On6+SfpmW0DFo14mA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgRCK8arZXSXxymNE2UyKuCpuzTXw_Hc1ac+sFBscp14_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQxELvNKU3sePs2OkugG-pr8L7ZD3tiw8Ni_yks2ByoKA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQJMN8r-O_xFqindUzWbhq_p=qcnu_J+xE5H7rkaxJyvQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgQ39WTgOBwO1XWVk7SvuK2nOQ_ruQewF+R2Z9mri2oOrA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgTcPywtGHoOWP+b0p+4QYPS9zRKAzAvTeqyApqcaUqE1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgT3-dyny2J+jznhf0=PNDNqw4wgHcgvs2u7sac6zstzSw@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgSTqcA2ZBO-D1WENh8gcfVb+9=5=P+uV+KssEF_CRsiAw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 18:33:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgQ5M6jD39JLxviqSbtyTzn--PQxS6xzhR7nqxT-RRBoLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Trans <trans@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11467a9a6953eb054acc8a2f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/cdCGJOiNEUATqbU_-j7PZUe_Dm4>
Subject: [Trans] Fresh issues!
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 22:34:10 -0000

Hey all,

I just submitted a whole crop of new issues (>10% of all WG issues to
date!) on 6962-bis:

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans/report/1

While these issues are numerous and some of them are non-trivial, none of
them are fundamental and I think most of them are pretty clearly
justified.  So hopefully it will be easy to make progress here.

I'd like to call out a few as especially critical, which basically encode
the objections EKR and I have been raising lately:

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans/ticket/162
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/trans/ticket/163

I will be off next week, but glad to meet up with folks at the IETF to
triage / fix issues.

--Richard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email