Re: [Trans] [trans] #116 (rfc6962-bis): ned definition for mis-issuance

Thanks Steve.  In that case, I'll propose to resolve #116 as a duplicate.

On 16/11/15 19:19, Stephen Kent wrote:
> Rob,
>
> You're right that issue #71 raised this problem, but I originally tagged
> it inaccurately.
>
>
> Steve
>> #116: ned definition for mis-issuance
>>
>>
>> Comment (by rob.stradling@comodo.com):
>>
>>   On the mailing list, Melinda wrote:
>>   "I was quite surprised to see this come through given that
>>   we've said repeatedly that the threat document isn't going
>>   to block the -bis document moving forward.  A better
>>   approach might be to propose text for the -bis draft."
>>
>>   Also, I suspect that this ticket is actually a duplicate of ticket #71.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Trans mailing list
> Trans@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
>

-- 
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online
Office Tel: +44.(0)1274.730505
Office Fax: +44.(0)1274.730909
www.comodo.com

COMODO CA Limited, Registered in England No. 04058690
Registered Office:
   3rd Floor, 26 Office Village, Exchange Quay,
   Trafford Road, Salford, Manchester M5 3EQ

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are 
addressed.  If you have received this email in error please notify the 
sender by replying to the e-mail containing this attachment. Replies to 
this email may be monitored by COMODO for operational or business 
reasons. Whilst every endeavour is taken to ensure that e-mails are free 
from viruses, no liability can be accepted and the recipient is 
requested to use their own virus checking software.