Re: [Trans] [trans] #116 (rfc6962-bis): ned definition for mis-issuance
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Mon, 16 November 2015 19:19 UTC
Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B73E1A882D for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:19:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.786
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.786 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uLp3NAWPC_B7 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:19:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFBF91A882C for <trans@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:19:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ssh.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:38254 helo=COMSEC.fios-router.home) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1ZyPJS-000GoL-J5 for trans@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:19:38 -0500
To: trans@ietf.org
References: <052.26da07fdda56bf6e561d3feeda8a2178@tools.ietf.org> <067.b30f84cabca9cd2c3e946f046036b2f0@tools.ietf.org>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Message-ID: <564A2C4A.5010008@bbn.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:19:38 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <067.b30f84cabca9cd2c3e946f046036b2f0@tools.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/g_YZ9FTpHFMlcTOmWLdciCA2Oco>
Subject: Re: [Trans] [trans] #116 (rfc6962-bis): ned definition for mis-issuance
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 19:19:41 -0000
Rob, You're right that issue #71 raised this problem, but I originally tagged it inaccurately. Steve > #116: ned definition for mis-issuance > > > Comment (by rob.stradling@comodo.com): > > On the mailing list, Melinda wrote: > "I was quite surprised to see this come through given that > we've said repeatedly that the threat document isn't going > to block the -bis document moving forward. A better > approach might be to propose text for the -bis draft." > > Also, I suspect that this ticket is actually a duplicate of ticket #71. >
- [Trans] [trans] #116 (rfc6962-bis): ned definitio… trans issue tracker
- [Trans] Fwd: [trans] #116 (rfc6962-bis): ned defi… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Trans] Fwd: [trans] #116 (rfc6962-bis): ned … Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #116 (rfc6962-bis): ned defin… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #116 (rfc6962-bis): ned defin… Stephen Kent
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #116 (rfc6962-bis): ned defin… Rob Stradling
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #116 (rfc6962-bis): ned defin… trans issue tracker
- Re: [Trans] [trans] #116 (rfc6962-bis): ned defin… trans issue tracker