Re: [Trans] Angle brackets in the PRIVATE option (Ticket #1)

Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org> Tue, 01 April 2014 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <gerv@mozilla.org>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C5C1A08C2 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 13:28:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Go7hw_mCSTPU for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 13:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx1.corp.phx1.mozilla.com [63.245.216.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246E91A06BC for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 13:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.125] (93.243.187.81.in-addr.arpa [81.187.243.93]) (Authenticated sender: gerv@mozilla.org) by mx1.mail.corp.phx1.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3CEAF2183; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 13:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <533B217E.90103@mozilla.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 21:28:46 +0100
From: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:30.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/30.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>, Peter Bowen <pzbowen@gmail.com>, Rick Andrews <Rick_Andrews@symantec.com>
References: <544B0DD62A64C1448B2DA253C011414607C85F3902@TUS1XCHEVSPIN33.SYMC.SYMANTEC.COM> <CAK6vND-NToUO3FgC-Tp-nykj-LYpDQE0AewJeF5oUHow6XSLSQ@mail.gmail.com> <53393F1F.6080005@comodo.com> <533AC501.30206@mozilla.org> <533B20F8.10803@comodo.com>
In-Reply-To: <533B20F8.10803@comodo.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.7a1pre
OpenPGP: id=9DF43DBB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/98r0MOFLWsMAgY7cx-gc_8AM7vk
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Angle brackets in the PRIVATE option (Ticket #1)
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 20:28:55 -0000

On 01/04/14 21:26, Rob Stradling wrote:
> Hi Gerv.  I don't think this is desirable.
> 
> Only the domain owner needs to know what the unmasked subdomains are,
> and they can do this by simply looking at the corresponding Certificate.

Does it not help with your combinatorial explosion, because it's then
much easier to match up a potential cert with its logged precert?

Or am I mistaken?

Gerv