Re: [Trans] Angle brackets in the PRIVATE option (Ticket #1)

Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com> Tue, 01 April 2014 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
X-Original-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4E61A08C2 for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 13:26:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.29
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LpRafy5SG9nV for <trans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 13:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ian.brad.office.comodo.net (eth5.brad-fw.brad.office.ccanet.co.uk [178.255.87.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32ABE1A06BC for <trans@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 13:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 16186 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Apr 2014 20:26:32 -0000
Received: from nigel.brad.office.comodo.net (HELO [192.168.0.58]) (192.168.0.58) (smtp-auth username rob, mechanism plain) by ian.brad.office.comodo.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Tue, 01 Apr 2014 21:26:32 +0100
Message-ID: <533B20F8.10803@comodo.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 21:26:32 +0100
From: Rob Stradling <rob.stradling@comodo.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>, Peter Bowen <pzbowen@gmail.com>, Rick Andrews <Rick_Andrews@symantec.com>
References: <544B0DD62A64C1448B2DA253C011414607C85F3902@TUS1XCHEVSPIN33.SYMC.SYMANTEC.COM> <CAK6vND-NToUO3FgC-Tp-nykj-LYpDQE0AewJeF5oUHow6XSLSQ@mail.gmail.com> <53393F1F.6080005@comodo.com> <533AC501.30206@mozilla.org>
In-Reply-To: <533AC501.30206@mozilla.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/trans/O_gOGYUgVdfdWENg1zZuOOKSH3s
Cc: "trans@ietf.org" <trans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Trans] Angle brackets in the PRIVATE option (Ticket #1)
X-BeenThere: trans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Public Notary Transparency working group discussion list <trans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trans/>
List-Post: <mailto:trans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans>, <mailto:trans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 20:26:41 -0000

On 01/04/14 14:54, Gervase Markham wrote:
> On 31/03/14 12:10, Rob Stradling wrote:
>> How long would it take an attacker to perform a dictionary attack to
>> discover that "6f993bb2" corresponds to "mail.corp" ?
>
> If only some correlation is desired, then you could just use e.g. the
> last two digits of the checksum. This allows a correct match when in
> possession of the correct cert, but also one can imagine many
> non-existent certs which would also match.

Hi Gerv.  I don't think this is desirable.

Only the domain owner needs to know what the unmasked subdomains are, 
and they can do this by simply looking at the corresponding Certificate.

-- 
Rob Stradling
Senior Research & Development Scientist
COMODO - Creating Trust Online