Re: [trill] Charter Revision Active-Active Item
zhai.hongjun@zte.com.cn Wed, 19 June 2013 00:39 UTC
Return-Path: <zhai.hongjun@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: trill@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FC921E80B6; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -95.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100, WEIRD_QUOTING=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C-GuPIYsZWkE; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A297921E80A5; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:39:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.168.120]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTP id 896F41930A5C; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:38:51 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse01.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.20]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 62B2BCB61CF; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:38:49 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id r5J0cdVM067032; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:38:39 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from zhai.hongjun@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <CAF4+nEE6jVhwekyvDpVWozJtcGv8c48SB-qpXk-L9eQ_AF32Ow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: C482EA04:76BBEF64-48257B8E:0026D911; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OFC482EA04.76BBEF64-ON48257B8E.0026D911-48257B8F.0003C312@zte.com.cn>
From: zhai.hongjun@zte.com.cn
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:38:39 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP1 HF212|May 23, 2012) at 2013-06-19 08:38:36, Serialize complete at 2013-06-19 08:38:36
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0003C30F48257B8F_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn r5J0cdVM067032
Cc: trill-bounces@ietf.org, trill@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [trill] Charter Revision Active-Active Item
X-BeenThere: trill@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <trill.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill>
List-Post: <mailto:trill@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill>, <mailto:trill-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:39:22 -0000
> > 1. Simplified AF mechanism with the approach specified by RFC6325 > > appendix A.3. draft-yizhou-trill-tc-awareness described STP topology > > change problem within this scenario too. > I think the TRILL WG can produce a document updating Appendix A.3 of > RFC 6325 without having that included in a special numbered work item. Support. I think the update of appendix A of RFC6325 can achieve another way of load balancing which is different from MC-LAG(or active/active) load balancing scenario, so it should not be included in the work item. But I support to put it into an individual document. Best Regards, Hongjun Zhai """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Protocol Development Dept.VI, Central R&D Institute, ZTE Corporation No. 68, Zijinghua Road, Yuhuatai District, Nanjing, P.R.China, 210012 Hongjun Zhai Tel: +86-25-52877345 Email: zhai.hongjun@zte.com.cn """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> 发件人: trill-bounces@ietf.org 2013-06-15 02:47 收件人 trill@ietf.org 抄送 主题 Re: [trill] Charter Revision Active-Active Item Hi Yizhou, On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Yizhou Li <liyizhou@huawei.com> wrote: > Currently we have appointed forwarder (AF) mechanism for > multi-access link connecting to edge RBridges. As AF only allows one > RBridge forwarding frames for a single VLAN, it is normally > considered as VLAN scoped active-standby though traffic can be load > balanced among VLANs. > > The word "active-active" used in item 2 excludes the problems > identified for current AF mechanism and non active-active > scenarios. I think something like "multi-access connections at the > edge" is a better description. Problems in multi-access connections > but not typical active-active scenarios include the following in my > opinion, > > 1. Simplified AF mechanism with the approach specified by RFC6325 > appendix A.3. draft-yizhou-trill-tc-awareness described STP topology > change problem within this scenario too. I think the TRILL WG can produce a document updating Appendix A.3 of RFC 6325 without having that included in a special numbered work item. > 2. Optimization of AF mechanism, e.g - Better convergence time for > failure recovery. Currently (3*) Hello timer is used to detect the > neighbor RB failure and then DRB should re-assign the VLANs > previously delegated to the failed RB to others. It takes too long > time in practice. I believe at least for access link (not equipment) > failure some optimization can be done for traditional AF mechanism > to improve the detection timer and AF re-assignment. Connectivity failure to a neighbor RB can also be detected by BFD or in other ways. But in any case, updating RFC 6439 concerning Appointed Forwarders is also something I think we can do without it being included in a special numbered work item. Thanks, Donald ============================= Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA d3e3e3@gmail.com > 3. Common problems for both active-active and active-standby (AF like > mechanism) cases. E.g. rapid MAC address purge at the remote RBridge when > existing nickname-MAC correspondence becomes invalid at local. > > I propose one of the following to be present in the charter. > 1) Specify a larger scope for item 2. E.g. replace active-active with > multi-access > Or > 2) Add another item. Something like, Enhancement of current multi-access > connection mechanism at the edge of a TRILL campus. > > > Thanks, > Yizhou > > -----Original Message----- > From: trill-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:trill-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Donald Eastlake > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 10:06 AM > To: trill@ietf.org > Subject: [trill] Charter Revision Active-Active Item > > Hi, > > Item "(2) Active-Active connection at the edge of a TRILL campus. > (draft-ietf-trill-cmt, draft-hu-trill-pseudonode-nickname)" > > There appeared to be agreement that work should be done in this space > but a better problem statement / scope was requested. > > Comments? > > Thanks, > Donald _______________________________________________ trill mailing list trill@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
- [trill] Charter Revision Active-Active Item Donald Eastlake
- Re: [trill] Charter Revision Active-Active Item Donald Eastlake
- [trill] 答复: Charter Revision Active-Active Item Haoweiguo
- [trill] 答复: Charter Revision Active-Active Item Haoweiguo
- Re: [trill] Charter Revision Active-Active Item Yizhou Li
- Re: [trill] Charter Revision Active-Active Item Olen Stokes
- Re: [trill] Charter Revision Active-Active Item Donald Eastlake
- Re: [trill] 答复: Charter Revision Active-Active It… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [trill] 答复: Charter Revision Active-Active It… Jon Hudson
- [trill] 答复: 答复: Charter Revision Active-Active It… Haoweiguo
- Re: [trill] Charter Revision Active-Active Item Donald Eastlake
- Re: [trill] Charter Revision Active-Active Item zhai.hongjun