Re: [trill] trill ecmp utilization Wed, 23 May 2012 08:13 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BD121F86A3; Wed, 23 May 2012 01:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -95.176
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.176 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_44=0.6, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GEGOSvxnwb4e; Wed, 23 May 2012 01:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07F121F84CE; Wed, 23 May 2012 01:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] by with surfront esmtp id 621291455586978; Wed, 23 May 2012 16:10:22 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [] by [] with StormMail ESMTP id 33453.2327679635; Wed, 23 May 2012 16:13:39 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP id q4N8DYeY093648; Wed, 23 May 2012 16:13:34 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from
In-Reply-To: <>
To: Sam Aldrin <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 269CA915:1D600583-48257A07:002C8F2A; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:13:25 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2012-05-23 16:13:36, Serialize complete at 2012-05-23 16:13:36
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 002D2F6448257A07_="
X-MAIL: q4N8DYeY093648
Cc:, "" <>
Subject: Re: [trill] trill ecmp utilization
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Developing a hybrid router/bridge." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 08:14:00 -0000

Hi Sam, 

Thanks for your reply.

with ecmp utilization of all ecmp paths, you may find that a hash 
polarization happens, then what will you do about this?

Best regards,

Sam Aldrin <> 
2012-05-23 13:32

"" <>
"" <>
Re: [trill] trill ecmp utilization

It is per path, not node.


Sent from my iPhone

On May 22, 2012, at 8:33 PM, wrote:


I have a problem on the definition of ECMP  utilization in TRILL OAM Req 
draft, which said that:  "OAM MAY provide functionality to monitor 
utilization of ECMP paths to specified destination RBridges. Utilization 
is defined as distribution of traffic over different ECMP members." 

Given the figure below, RB1 is ingress Rbridge and RB9 is egress Rbridge, 
RB2 has three downstream RBs(RB3, RB4 and RB5) that can reach RB9, and RB6 
has two downstream RBs(RB7 and RB8)to RB9, so there are all 6 ECMP paths 
from RB1 to RB9. 

 Then, my question is: 
In the current text, does "ECMP member" mean one specific path from RB1 to 
RB9(such as RB1-RB2-RB3-RB6-RB7-RB9)? or one specific node(such as RB2)? 


Please correct me if my understanding is not correct. 

Best Regard, 

trill mailing list
trill mailing list